Stay ahead of developments in federal and state health care law, regulation and transactions with timely, expert news and analysis.
Aug. 10 — New nursing home ratings published on a Medicare-run consumer website don't answer questions about the system's accuracy, a Democratic senator told Bloomberg BNA Aug. 10.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services changed the overall five-star quality ratings on its Nursing Home Compare website by including data from another five quality measures, an Aug. 10 fact sheet said.
Increasing the number of measures on which nursing homes must report offers seniors and people with disabilities, along with their families, more information when picking a nursing home, Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) said.
However, these changes don't “impact the accuracy and reliability of the measures reported,” Casey said, adding that he and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) in 2015 asked the Government Accountability Office to examine the nursing home five-star rating system and help determine its accuracy (167 HCDR, 8/28/15).
Nursing Home Compare is a public website that consumers can use to search for and compare nursing homes. The site features a five-star rating system, which evaluates nursing homes' performance on health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. These three ratings are combined to calculate an overall rating, which ranges from one star (the worst possible score) to five stars (the best possible score).
The new quality measures reflect the rate of short-term nursing home residents who:
A fifth quality measure looks at how many long-stay residents experience a decline in their ability to move independently.
“With the new quality measures added to the calculations, the quality measures star rating for each nursing home, as well as the overall rating, will likely change,” an Aug. 10 press release from the CMS said.
The CMS first announced in April that it would add the five quality measures (82 HCDR, 4/28/16). The Medicare agency originally planned to incorporate the new measures into the star ratings in July, it said at the time.
It also said then that it would include a sixth measure: the percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication.
However, the CMS didn't incorporate that measure “because it has been difficult to determine appropriate nursing home benchmarks for the acceptable use of these medications,” the fact sheet said.
A nursing home industry group, the American Health Care Association (AHCA), didn't respond to requests for comment on the new quality measures. AARP, an advocacy group for senior citizens, told Bloomberg BNA Aug. 10 that it couldn't comment on the updating ratings at this time.
The GAO, the investigational arm of Congress, agreed to Casey and Wyden's request to investigate the nursing home five-star rating system in August 2015.
“We expect the GAO report to be published this fall  and look forward to their recommendations on how the system can be improved,” Casey told Bloomberg BNA.
Casey and Wyden, in their letter to GAO requesting the investigation, said media reports questioned the rating system's integrity ever since the CMS made changes to the Nursing Home Compare website in 2015. In February 2015, the CMS added quality measures on antipsychotic medication use and staffing levels (35 HCDR, 2/23/15).
At the time, the CMS acknowledged that nearly one in three nursing homes would see a drop in their quality ranking with the rating system changes. Nursing home providers said those changes would result in confusion among customers.
The February 2015 changes “caused an estimated 4,777 of 15,500 centers nationwide to lose one or more stars in their individual quality rankings even though nothing about the quality of care those centers offered changed,” Greg Crist, senior vice president of public affairs at the AHCA,told Bloomberg BNA in August 2015.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael D. Williamson in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Brian Broderick at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)