Bloomberg Law®, an integrated legal research and business intelligence solution, combines trusted news and analysis with cutting-edge technology to provide legal professionals tools to be...
By Paul Barbagallo
A group of smaller wireless carriers launched a new coalition Sept. 10 to urge the Federal Communications Commission to finalize rules that would ensure that mobile devices used in the lower 700 megahertz band of spectrum can operate on airwaves used by different carriers, including Verizon Wireless and AT&T Inc.
During a Capitol Hill luncheon, representatives from the Interoperability Alliance said rules are needed now to enable the spread of mobile broadband access, especially in rural areas.
“This is an issue that the FCC needs to fix, and they need to fix it this year,” said Grant Spellmeyer, executive director of federal affairs and public policy for U.S. Cellular, the seventh-largest wireless carrier in the United States by number of subscribers. The FCC opened a new rulemaking proceeding in March to consider such proposals, but has yet to act.
Spellmeyer said many wireless carriers have stalled in their efforts to roll out the next generation of wireless coverage--4G--using the spectrum they purchased at the FCC's 700 MHz band auction in 2008.
Thus, all handsets, chipsets, and network equipment made for band class 13 are incompatible with band class 17 or band class 12, and vice versa. According to people who follow the telecommunications industry, some manufacturers have declined requests to build phones and network equipment for some smaller companies because band class 12, taken by itself, lacks the scale necessary to attract vendor partners.
For these smaller carriers, to guarantee their customers seamless roaming on Verizon's and AT&T's networks, they would have to convince a manufacturer to make a phone that contains band class 12, 13, and 17 chipsets, which Spellmeyer says is not “technically possible.”
“Each device has a limitation on the number of spectrum bands that you can [access],” Spellmeyer said. “You have bands for international roaming, public safety. That's why it's so dangerous to add additional band classes. The more of those bands you create and the smaller you make them, the bigger the challenge is to get them all into one device.”
In comments filed in June with the FCC, AT&T pointed out that U.S. Cellular has announced that it will be introducing a variety of band-class 12 LTE devices this year, and it already sells a band-class 12 smartphone, tablet, modem, and WiFi hotspot. That month, U.S. Cellular became the only non-national carrier to begin offering a new LTE Samsung device.
“Certain large wireless carriers make a big deal that we're out there deploying [services],” Spellmeyer said. “That doesn't mean that there isn't a major issue here.”
“We've been trying to put this humpty-dumpty back together again for years now.”Steven Berry, CEO, Competitive Carriers Association
According to Verizon and AT&T, the issue boils down to one of interference. In rebutting the claims of smaller carriers, both companies have argued in filings with the FCC that one of the underlying reasons for separating the 700 MHz blocks into different band classes is interference--the proximity of A Block spectrum pairs to TV broadcast transmissions on one hand, and high-power broadcast transmissions in the unpaired 700 MHz “D Block” and “E Block” on the other.
“The attempt by AT&T and Verizon to inhibit device interoperability is really just another tactic to divide the marketplace between themselves, which has dramatically slowed build-out of mobile broadband in rural areas,” said Benjamin Lennett, policy director for the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute.
The alliance, whose company members have been lobbying the FCC on the issue since 2009, will be pushing for FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski to finalize rules in time for a full commission vote at either the agency's Nov. 30 open meeting or Dec. 12 open meeting.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)