The Financial Accounting Resource Center™ is a comprehensive research service that provides the full text of standards, the latest news from the Accounting Policy & Practice Report ®,...
By Denise Lugo
March 13 –– Companies applying the Financial Accounting Standards Board's recently issued consolidation accounting rules will have to revisit their entire process of evaluating the consolidation of special purpose entities, a PricewaterhouseCoopers practitioner told Bloomberg BNA March 12.
“The model has changed the way the evaluation needs to take place, so any company that uses structured arrangements, special purpose vehicles in a large way, will absolutely have to invest time going through the new evaluation,” said John Bishop, a leader in PricewaterhouseCoopers's national office.
“Whether the end results are going to be markedly different, that is still unclear,” he said.
Practitioners have said, however, that the biggest impact is expected for limited partnerships because more of them will be considered variable interest entities (VIEs) under the new rules.
Bishop agrees, stating that any company that has financial relationships with limited partnerships need to be very alert. “At the margin, at a minimum, required disclosures will go up,” he said.
Just because an entity is characterized as a variable interest entity, however, doesn't mean that the ultimate consolidation conclusion will necessarily change, said Bishop.
There are a lot of steps to reach the consolidation conclusion, and therefore it isn't clear yet whether the ultimate answer is going to change, though the analysis will change and disclosures will increase, he said.
The guidance, ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic ASC 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, was issued Feb. 18 (11 APPR 208, 2/27/15) and reduces the consolidation models from four to two. It's effective for periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2016 for public companies. Earlier adoption is permitted.
In two webcasts March 10, other PWC practitioners highlighted accounting approaches for financial services, commercial and industrial services type companies.
In general, the two remaining consolidation models have fundamentally changed—in many respects—how the analysis should be approached, practitioners said. Therefore, the start-up work in applying the guidance is going to be challenging, they said.
The rules are especially significant for companies that organize their corporate activity using legal vehicles such as limited partnerships or limited liability corporations.
Some companies use those vehicles because of the tax advantages they can provide.
The first thing chief financial officers should consider under the new rules is to evaluate whether entities are corporate entities or limited partnership entities, said Bishop.
For the corporate entities, there is a different way of evaluating whether the corporate shareholders in fact have control over the company. Where the rules will have the biggest impact is in the sectors that commonly outsource through contractual arrangements, he said.
Outsourcing examples include:
• the hotel industry that hires professional management;
• the shipping industry that may hire professional crews to make all the decisions on operation and running ships; and
• the energy sector.
To contact the reporter on this story: Denise Lugo in New York, at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Marcy at email@example.com
For a copy of the consolidation ASU go to: http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Page/SectionPage&cid=1176156316498
For a general discussion of business combinations, see 5174, VIE Consolidation Model: Identifying Variable Interests and Entities Considered VIEs, at 5174.
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)