The Tax Management Transfer Pricing Report ™ provides news and analysis on U.S. and international governments’ tax policies regarding intercompany transfer pricing.
By Thomas A. Humphreys, Esq., Matthew Y. Lau, Esq., Joy S. MacIntyre, Esq., and Remmelt A. Reigersman, Esq.
Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY, Hong Kong, China, and San Francisco, CA
On September 14, 2015, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2015-59 (the "Notice") and Rev. Proc. 2015-43 (the "Rev. Proc."; together with the Notice, the "Spin-Off Guidance"). Under the Spin-Off Guidance, the IRS has significantly limited the circumstances under which it will issue a private letter ruling with respect to spin-off or split-off transactions that are considered "cash-rich"1 or that involve real estate investment trusts ("REITs") or regulated investment companies ("RICs").2
Although the Spin-Off Guidance does not change the law that currently applies to spin-off transactions, it will nevertheless be a significant consideration for any company contemplating such a transaction. The Spin-Off Guidance not only eliminates the certainty of an IRS ruling for transactions within its ambit, but also indicates a potential heightened risk of an IRS challenge under current law, as well as the prospect of future changes to the applicable rules.
Summary of the Notice
In the Notice, the IRS states that it is studying issues regarding the tax-free qualification of spin-offs with one or more of the following characteristics:
The IRS is concerned that spin-offs with one or more of these characteristics might not satisfy the various requirements for tax-free treatment. For example, according to the IRS, such a spin-off might not have an adequate "business purpose," Distributing or Controlled might lack a sufficient "active trade or business," or the transaction might be seen as being used principally as a "device" for the tax-free distribution of the earnings and profits of Distributing or Controlled that would otherwise be taxable. More broadly, the IRS expresses concern that spin-offs having any of these characteristics might evade existing rules that are intended to impose corporate-level tax when a corporation distributes built-in gain assets to its shareholders. The spin-off rules provide a key exception to triggering corporate-level tax on such a distribution.
The IRS also observes that "an increasing number" of spin-offs intended for tax-free treatment involve Distributing or Controlled becoming a REIT. The IRS notes that such transactions "may involve corporations that, prior to the distribution, do not meet the requirements to be REITs and intend to separate REIT-qualifying assets from non-qualifying assets so that [Distributing] or [Controlled] can meet the requirements to be a REIT." The IRS is concerned that these spin-offs also might not satisfy the requirements for tax-free treatment (including the "active trade or business" requirement, the "business purpose" requirement, and the "device" prohibition), particularly because they may involve a relatively small "active trade or business" as well as the retention of control or use of the REIT's assets through long-term leases or other arrangements. The IRS also requests comments regarding these issues.
The rules that govern non pro rata split-off exchanges are sufficiently different from those that apply to pro rata spin-off distributions that one might have expected split-offs to fall outside the reach of the IRS study. Despite acknowledging those differences, the IRS expressly states in the Notice that split-off transactions are also under study and subject to the same revised ruling standards described below.
Summary of the Rev. Proc.
Historically, the IRS has declined to issue private letter rulings or determination letters regarding certain areas of U.S. tax law, "because the issues are inherently factual or for other reasons." These "no-rule areas" are generally published annually in revenue procedures.
The IRS has expanded these no-rule areas to include certain spin-off transactions, as explained in the Notice. Specifically, under the Rev. Proc., the IRS ordinarily will not issue rulings on the following issues unless the taxpayer can demonstrate "unique and compelling" reasons to justify the rulings:
The IRS will take into account all of the facts and circumstances in evaluating whether there exists a "unique and compelling" reason to justify a ruling where the 5% standard is not met. In that regard, the Notice specifically cites situations in which a substantial portion of a corporation's assets would qualify as Business Assets but for the lack of a five-year business history, and where the Business Assets involved, though not satisfying the 5% standard, bear a particular relationship to the business purpose for the distribution.
In addition, the IRS temporarily will not issue rulings on the following issue, because the area is under study:
The Rev. Proc. is effective for all ruling requests that are postmarked or, if not mailed, received on or after September 14, 2015.
At this time, it is impossible to predict how long the IRS will study the issues identified and what the ultimate outcome will be. Notably, and somewhat unusually for IRS guidance of this sort, the IRS has not affirmatively indicated that it intends to change the existing spin-off requirements or issue new regulations to address the transactions covered by the Spin-Off Guidance, nor has it even provided a deadline by which the public must submit comments on these issues.
Interestingly, the key concerns noted by the IRS in the Notice (the "active trade or business" requirement, the "business purpose" requirement, and the "device" prohibition) are issues on which the IRS ordinarily has been unwilling to rule in recent years, even prior to the Spin-Off Guidance. However, corporations have been able to obtain IRS rulings on other aspects of their spin-offs, and there has been some general perception that the transaction as a whole might therefore be less likely to attract IRS scrutiny even as to aspects not covered by the IRS ruling. The expansion of the no-rule policy on these transactions denies the possibility of this so-called halo effect, and eliminates the potential for an IRS ruling on other issues that might be raised by a spin-off falling within the new no-rule policy.
Without the ability to obtain an IRS ruling, market participants will have to rely more heavily on their outside advisors and, as a practical matter, might face a greater likelihood of IRS scrutiny of their transaction, even though the legal standards currently remain the same. Therefore, while the area remains under study by the IRS, companies may become more cautious in pursuing a cashrich spin-off or a spin-off involving a REIT or RIC if it falls within the ambit of the no-rule policy.
For more information, in the Tax Management Portfolios, see Carnevale, de Bree, Schneider, Temkin & Witt, 742 T.M., Real Estate Investment Trusts, and in Tax Practice Series, see ¶5180, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).
©2015 Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved.
2 For purpose of this Insight, "spin-off" includes both pro rata spin-off distributions and non pro rata split off exchanges. As explained below, the IRS does not distinguish between these two types of transactions for purpose of the study and the revised ruling standards.
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)