Stay informed and ready to meet both everyday challenges and long-term planning and policy-making goals, with focused news, practical information, and strategic insights on all HR-related developments.
By Lisa Nagele
Nov. 12 — A cable installer in Nevada can't proceed with his Fair Labor Standards Act wage and hour claims because his complaint didn't point to a specific week in which he was entitled to but denied overtime and minimum wage payments, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Nov. 12.
Affirming a district court decision granting Quality Communications Inc.'s motion to dismiss, the Ninth Circuit found that, when applying the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), to FLSA claims, it is no longer enough for a worker to simply allege that an employer failed to pay required overtime and minimum wage compensation.
The case presented an issue of first impression for the Ninth Circuit to address the degree of specificity required to state an FLSA claim. “Although the circuit courts are in harmony on what is not required by Twombly and Iqbal, there is no consensus on what facts must be affirmatively pled to state a viable FLSA claim post-Twombly and Iqbal,” the court said.
“Although plaintiffs in these types of cases cannot be expected to allege ‘with mathematical precision,' the amount of overtime compensation owed by the employer, they should be able to specify at least one workweek in which they worked in excess of forty hours and were not paid overtime wages,” Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson wrote for the court.
In this case, Greg Landers only made generalized allegations without any detail about a specific workweek in which he worked over 40 hours and was not paid overtime or minimum wages, Rawlinson said.
Text of the opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/GREG_LANDERS_individually_and_on_behalf_of_others_similarly_situa.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)