Keep up with the latest developments and legal issues in the telecommunications and emerging technology sectors, with exclusive access to a comprehensive collection of telecommunications law news,...
Dec. 9 — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit won’t reconsider two earlier decisions shedding light on what constitutes unauthorized access under a federal computer fraud law.
The Ninth Circuit held in United States v. Nosal that the use of a past colleague’s password to access a former employer’s computers violates the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) ( United States v. Nosal , 2016 BL 409354, 9th Cir., No. 14-10275, petition for rehearing denied 12/8/16 ( Nosal II)). It held in Facebook Inc. v. Power Ventures Inc. that a social media aggregator violated the statute for accessing Facebook Inc.'s user data without permission from the social media giant ( Facebook Inc v. Power Ventures Inc. , 9th Cir., No. 13-17102, petition for rehearing denied 12/9/16 ).
The scope of the CFAA has been widely debated, particularly because it was originally designed to criminalize computer hacking. Critics have argued that the Ninth Circuit’s decisions create confusion over whether the law would now criminalize password sharing.
The Ninth Circuit rebuffed that criticism in a Dec. 8 amended opinion in Nosal II, saying a critical element of the CFAA is the requirement that the access be “knowingly and with intent to defraud.” This element “targets knowing and specific conduct and does not embrace the parade of hypotheticals generated by Nosal and amici,” the court said.
The Ninth Circuit tried to make clear that its decision wouldn’t apply in all situations, Jamie Lee Williams, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told Bloomberg BNA Dec. 9. The court didn’t, however, go back and change the analysis that led to the potential confusion, she said.
The appeals court held in Nosal II that defendant David Nosal accessed his former employer’s computers “without authorization” within the meaning of the statute. The court said that once the employer explicitly revoked Nosal’s computer access credentials, Nosal couldn’t “sidestep the statute by going through the back door and accessing the computer through a third party.”
Judge Stephen Reinhardt, dissenting in the case, said that the opinion lost sight of the purpose of the CFAA and could have the effect of criminalizing consensual password sharing.
Nosal asked for a full appellate court rehearing last August. He posed a number of hypotheticals of third parties accessing a computer with a legitimate account holder’s permission but without the computer owner’s, such as a mother accessing her son’s Facebook account to monitor social media usage. Nosal asked the Ninth Circuit for guidance on what conduct would be a crime under the law.
The Ninth Circuit said in its amended opinion that the decision applies to scenarios involving express revocation of access by the computer owner.
“One can certainly pose hypotheticals in which a less stark revocation is followed by more sympathetic access through an authorized third party,” the court said. “But the facts before us—in which Nosal received particularized notice of his revoked access following a prolonged negotiation—present no such difficulties, which can be reserved for another day.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Alexis Kramer in Washington at aKramer@bna.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Keith Perine at email@example.com
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)