From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
By Michael Rose
Aug. 24 — The National Labor Relations Board made changes to the formula used to calculate back pay for workers whose federal labor law rights are violated ( King Soopers Inc. , 2016 BL 274675, 364 N.L.R.B. No. 93, 8/24/16 ).
In a case involving grocery store chain King Soopers, a division of Kroger Co., the board decided Aug. 24 that expenses incurred by workers in searching for employment after being terminated in an unfair labor practice shouldn’t be offset from interim earnings, as was previously the case.
As a result of the decision, workers who are terminated but later ordered to be made whole with back pay likely will receive larger monetary awards. It’s unclear, however, whether the change will affect many cases.
The board invited amicus briefs in the case, but the only party to file a brief arguing in favor of what the board called its “traditional” approach to the calculation of expenses was King Soopers itself.
Attorneys for King Soopers didn’t respond to a request for comment, nor did a spokeswoman for the grocery chain.
The AFL-CIO, the Service Employees International Union and an International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers local in Kansas filed amicus briefs in support of the NLRB general counsel’s proposed changes, which the board adopted.
NLRB Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce and Members Kent Y. Hirozawa and Lauren McFerran wrote the majority opinion. Member Philip A. Miscimarra concurred in part and dissented in part.
David Rosenfeld, a partner with Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld in Alameda, Calif., also filed an amicus brief. He told Bloomberg BNA Aug. 24 that he doesn’t expect the effects of the decision to be drastic, since the issue of interim earnings and job search-related expenses doesn’t come up very often in unfair labor practice cases.
“People do find jobs” after being terminated, Rosenfeld said, and “often they do find jobs that are the equivalent of what they lost, so there isn’t a lot of back pay.”
The board majority agreed, writing that “Board proceedings have rarely involved litigation over search-for-work and interim employment expenses.”
Under previous NLRB procedures, expenses involved in a search for work—such as travel or expenses incurred in a move to a location where the worker finds a job—couldn't exceed a worker’s interim earnings, or what the worker made between the time he or she was terminated and when awarded back pay.
This had the effect of often reducing compensation that terminated workers could be awarded, the board wrote.
As a result of the King Soopers decision, workers found to have been wrongly terminated will be able to receive separate reimbursement for their job search expenses, along with back pay.
In his dissent, Miscimarra said the “traditional approach” to calculating job search expenses “makes claimants whole in most cases, and the change adopted by my colleagues will result in greater than make-whole relief in other cases.”
“I do not discount the fact that parties and claimants experience substantial, often oppressive non-monetary consequences as the result of unfair labor practices,” Miscimarra wrote. “Nonetheless, the [National Labor Relations Act] only permits the Board to award relief that is remedial” rather than compensatory.
He also argued that the change would lead to “protracted Board litigation” over such expenses, and that the “traditional” approach was in line with the ways in which other statutes calculate the expenses as a component of back pay.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Rose in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Susan J. McGolrick at email@example.com
Text of the decision is at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/NLRB_Board_Decision_King_Soopers_Inc_364_NLRB_No_93_2016_BL_27467.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)