Bloomberg Law: Privacy & Data Security brings you single-source access to the expertise of Bloomberg Law’s privacy and data security editorial team, contributing practitioners,...
Aug. 17 — A group of former Apple Inc. mobile device users Aug. 13 failed to get class certification in a lawsuit alleging that the company intentionally intercepted text messages sent from current Apple device users to former Apple device users.
Judge Lucy H. Koh of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California held that the plaintiffs lacked standing under California's Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 (UCL), and that the proposed class was unascertainable.
The court, however, concluded that Apple's alleged violation of the federal Wiretap Act is “sufficient” to satisfy Article III's injury-in-fact requirement for standing.
In doing so, the court noted that it is aware that the U.S. Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 135 S. Ct. 1892 (2015), and that the Supreme Court may address whether the actual injury requirement can be satisfied solely by a defendant's alleged violation of a statutory legal right.
In 2011, Apple released a proprietary messaging service called “iMessage,” which is an alternative to other forms of messaging, including Short Message Service and Multimedia Messaging Service (SMS and MMS).
Consumers filed a putative class action against Apple, claiming that if a current Apple device user sends a text message to a former Apple device user, the company intercepts the message, “insuring its nondelivery.” The plaintiffs alleged that Apple's practices violated the federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510; the UCL; and the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2701.
In November 2014, the court dismissed the bulk of the plaintiffs' claims but allowed the Wiretap Act claim and some of the UCL claims to move forward.
In May, the plaintiffs moved to certify a nationwide class of former iPhone and iMessage users who switched to a non-Apple device and whose text messages from current Apple device users were intercepted and not received. Apple opposed, arguing that the plaintiffs failed to satisfy the requirements for Article III standing and UCL standing.
Although the plaintiffs have satisfied Article III standing, they failed to show that they lost “any money or property” as required to have standing to assert UCL claims, the court said.
It also held that the proposed class definition is unascertainable because “it would require individualized factual determinations merely to determine whether an individual falls within the proposed class.” Under the proposed class definition, a class member would have to know that the third party was using iMessage, that the third party attempted to send the proposed class member a text message that the class member didn't receive and that the undelivered text message was intercepted.
The plaintiffs have failed to show that the proposed class members will be “capable of reliable self-identification,” the court concluded, “or that it would be administratively feasible” for the court to determine class membership.
Audet & Partners LLP represented the plaintiffs. Morrison & Foerster LLP represented Apple.
Full text of the court's opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Backhaut_v_Apple_Inc_No_14CV02285LHK_2015_BL_262547_ND_Cal_Aug_13.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)