Daily Labor Report® is the objective resource the nation’s foremost labor and employment professionals read and rely on, providing reliable, analytical coverage of top labor and employment...
By Kevin McGowan
Dec. 29 — The estate of a deceased black Boston city employee may pursue race discrimination and retaliation claims under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C. § 1981), despite the worker's failure to file a timely administrative charge of discrimination, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled Dec. 29.
Partly reviving the lawsuit filed by Oswald Hixon's estate, the court said Hixon's failure to file a state agency discrimination charge until nearly three years after he was fired doesn't affect the right to pursue Section 1981 claims.
Unlike Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Reconstruction-era civil rights statute doesn't require claimants to exhaust administrative remedies before filing discrimination lawsuits, the court said. The district court erred by dismissing the estate's Section 1981 claims for failure to file a timely charge with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, the First Circuit said.
The decision illustrates why Section 1981 sometimes can be a better option than Title VII for race discrimination plaintiffs.
The city argued the estate's race bias and retaliation claims nevertheless must be dismissed for failure to sue within the statute of limitations or because the complaint contains only “conclusory allegations.”
But the First Circuit said the Section 1981 claims challenging Hixon's February 2011 suspension and discharge were filed within the applicable four-year limitations period. The complaint includes “specific and factual” allegations that “plausibly suggest” the estate is entitled to relief under Section 1981, Judge Norman H. Stahl wrote.
A mechanic employed by Boston's public works department, Hixon in 2007 was placed on probation for failing a random drug and alcohol test.
On Feb. 4, 2011, two white supervisors gave Hixon a written warning for bringing his personal vehicle into a city garage for repairs. Hixon protested that white employees routinely did so without discipline.
The supervisors suspended Hixon after his outburst and on Feb. 10, they terminated him for a purported violation of the drug and alcohol policy. The supervisors subsequently opposed Hixon's application for unemployment compensation, testifying falsely he had been under the influence of drugs at work.
Hixon eventually obtained the jobless benefits but in December 2013, he filed race bias and retaliation charges with the state anti-discrimination agency.
After Hixon died in 2014, his estate sued, alleging violations of Section 1981 and the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1983).
The First Circuit said the Section 1983 claims are untimely as they relate to Hixon's suspension and termination because the lawsuit was filed outside Section 1983's three-year limitations period.
The Section 1983 claims relating to the alleged false testimony against Hixon were timely filed, but the estate failed to allege a plausible due process violation, the court said.
Judges William J. Kayatta and David J. Barron joined in the decision.
Winston Kendall in Roxbury, Mass., represented Hixon's estate. The City of Boston Law Department represented the city and individual defendants.
To contact the reporter on this story: Kevin McGowan in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Susan J. McGolrick at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)