Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
By Pat Rizzuto
Sept. 11 — The Environmental Protection Agency has no proof that a key pollution prevention program has cut U.S. use of hazardous materials as claimed, the agency's inspector general said in a report released Sept. 9.
The agency also can't claim the pollution prevention program is cost effective because the program doesn't measure cost-effectiveness, the inspector general said.
In response to the report, the EPA said it has removed cost-effectiveness claims from the website describing its Design for the Environment (DfE) Safer Product Labeling Program.
The agency's response detailed other actions it already has begun to or plans to take to address the concerns the inspector general's report found. The EPA's response is included in the inspector general's report, “EPA Can Help Consumers Identify Household and Other Products with Safer Chemicals by Strengthening Its ‘Design for the Environment' Program.”
DfE's labeling program already allows more than 2,500 carpet cleaning products, dish soaps, floor care products, laundry detergent softeners and other consumer and institutional products to receive the agency's permission to carry a specific logo.
The DfE logo means a qualified third party has verified that all the chemicals used to make the product are among the safest compounds available for the particular function they provide. In addition, the product must perform well and be packaged in an environmentally friendly manner, the inspector general's report said.
The report evaluated various aspects of DfE's Safer Product Labeling program, including:
• claims the EPA makes about the program's benefits,
• consumer understanding of the logo the DfE Safer Product Labeling program uses, and
• EPA's oversight of manufacturers' use of the logo.
The IG said it found that the agency asserts DfE products are cost-effective.
The DfE program, however, doesn't have controls in place to assure cost-effectiveness, it said.
Similarly, the agency uses results from its DfE program to support claims that it has significantly reduced the pounds of hazardous materials used in the U.S. and increased the use of safer products, the report said.
“However, DfE results data are not appropriate or valid to support either measure,” the IG said.
In addition to removing the cost-effectiveness claims, the agency will no longer report pounds of hazardous materials reduced through pollution prevention nor a percent increase in the use of safer products, the report said.
Instead, the DfE program will track the number of products that have earned the DfE label and the number of chemicals—currently about 650—that are named on its Safer Chemicals Ingredients List, the report said.
“While the new measure is important, it has key limitations,” the inspector general said. “Counts of products that are labeled safer and chemicals on the Safer Chemical Ingredients List do not provide evidence that consumers are actually purchasing and using these products.”
On other issues, the inspector general recommended the agency periodically review manufacturers' compliance with the voluntary DfE program. For example, manufacturers are supposed to include on their product or website a disclaimer stating the DfE logo doesn't imply the EPA endorses their product.
In its response, the EPA said it already has begun to audit manufacturers' compliance. Those audits should be completed by the first quarter of fiscal year 2015 and will then continue, the agency said.
The inspector general said it found the current DfE logo does not adequately communicate to the consumer that the product is a safer product.
The logo also may imply to consumers that the EPA is endorsing DfE-labeled products, but agency endorsement isn't allowed, the inspector general said.
The EPA is in the process of redesigning the DfE logo, the agency said in its response. On Sept. 8, the EPA released for public comment several possible new logos it might use.
As part of the redesign, the EPA said it is working with its general counsel ensure the new design does not imply an endorsement.
Kathleen Stanton, director of technical and regulatory affairs for the American Cleaning Institute, told Bloomberg BNA the inspector general's report described concerns cleaning product manufacturers have voiced to the agency for many years.
The cleaning institute is pleased the EPA has said it will follow all recommendations the inspector general made.
“The report is very good,” Stanton said.
The institute, however, would like to see the inspector general examine other aspects of the DfE program, Stanton said.
For example, when DfE partnerships examine chemicals that may substitute for a compound of concern, they use a particular approach to conduct an alternatives assessment, she said.
California Environmental Protection Agency is emulating many aspects of DfE's alternative analyses as the state agency prepares to implement its Safer Consumer Products Regulation, Stanton said.
It could be useful to have an inspector general report examine DfE's approach, she said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Pat Rizzuto in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
The IG report, “EPA Can Help Consumers Identify Household and Other Products with Safer Chemicals by Strengthening Its ‘Design for the Environment' Program,” is available at http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2014/20140909-14-P-0349.pdf.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)