No Refill on Stock Fraud Suit Against Drug Concern, 2d Cir. Says

Stay up-to-date with the latest developments in securities law through access to both news and all statutes and regulations. Find relevant corporate filings through a searchable EDGAR database. And...

By Phyllis Diamond

Former employees of Covis Pharmaceuticals Inc. failed to revive claims the global drug concern fraudulently induced them to alter their holdings without disclosing it was engaged in merger negotiations ( Brown v. Cerberus Capital Mgmt. LP , 2017 BL 237853, 2d Cir., No. 17-63, 7/11/17 ).

The plaintiffs didn’t show that the alleged misrepresentations were material, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said in a July 11 summary order.

The former employees knew from the outset that they were involved in a short term venture and that Covis executives were interested in quickly selling corporate assets, the appeals court said. “The pendency of merger negotiations thus signaled no more than the Covis’s enterprise’s continued adherence to its announced corporation strategy.”

The court also affirmed that the plaintiffs didn’t adequately allege “scienter"--culpable intent.

To contact the reporter on this story: Phyllis Diamond in Washington at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Seth Stern at

Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Request Securities & Capital Markets on Bloomberg Law