Daily Tax Report: State provides authoritative coverage of state and local tax developments across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, tracking legislative and regulatory updates,...
Elimination of the federal deduction for taxes paid to state and local governments would hurt states that give more to the federal government than they get back in federal spending.
That’s according to a report released Oct. 5 from the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
Taxpayers in Connecticut would be hardest hit by eliminating the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, particularly when combined with the state’s negative balance of payments with the federal government, the report said. It’s followed by New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Illinois, and California.
Taxpayers in Mississippi and Alabama would take the smallest hit, when their balances of payments are considered. They are followed by New Mexico, Alaska, and Tennessee.
The Republican tax framework, released Sept. 27, would eliminate many deductions for individuals, including the break for state and local taxes. Eliminating the deduction is one of the largest pay-fors in the GOP plan to cut tax rates, but Republicans from states with higher taxes have expressed concern it could raise taxes for their constituents. They are trying to convince U.S. House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and other GOP leaders to soften the blow of cutting the tax break.
The proposal to eliminate the SALT deduction is generally opposed by lawmakers in high-tax blue states such as New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and California.
According to the report, Connecticut taxpayers face a tax increase of $4,286 if the SALT deduction is eliminated. New Yorkers would face an increase of $4,250 and New Jersey taxpayers would face an increase of $3,522, according to the report.
The smallest tax increases from elimination of the SALT deduction would be in Alaska ($992), Wyoming ($943), and Tennessee ($938).
The Senate’s top Democrat unloaded at the Republican proposal to end the deduction Oct. 5, calling it “dumb” and predicting that it alone will “kill” the White House and GOP’s tax efforts.
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said the use of the roughly $1.3 trillion tax break is “deep and wide” and affects many taxpayers in red states such as Utah and Iowa as well as New York and California. He labeled it the “Achilles heel” of the framework.
Schumer said the proposed tweaks that Republicans are considering to win over House members in high-tax states—such as an income cap or letting tax filers choose between deducting mortgage interest and state and local taxes—are “half baked and won’t work.”
Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY) said Oct. 4 that key GOP members have signaled to him the state and local tax deduction will be preserved in some form.
Eliminating the deduction is designed to allow congressional Republicans to pay for individual and corporate tax cuts.
The White House has said the tax reform framework was crafted with the middle class in mind.
However, a report released Oct. 4 by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, said the richest 1 percent of residents in all but a handful of states would receive at least half of the tax cuts being considered by Congress.
The framework calls for rate cuts in individual and corporate taxes for most taxpayers. More than two-thirds of the cuts contained in the framework would go to the richest 1 percent in 2018, the ITEP report said.
Those taxpayers are projected to have incomes of at least $615,800 next year, the report said. They would receive an average tax cut of $90,610 in 2018, increasing the incomes by an average of 4.3 percent.
The middle fifth of households, projected to earn between $41,000 and $66,000 in 2018, would receive an average tax cut of just $410 next year, which would increase their incomes by an average of just 0.8 percent, the report said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Sahil Kapur in Washington at email@example.com (Bloomberg), Che Odom at COdom@bna.com (Bloomberg BNA), and Gerald B. Silverman in Albany, N.Y. at mailto:GSilverman (Bloomberg BNA)
Copyright © 2017 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)