Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
By Avery Fellow
WASHINGTON, D.C.--An international agreement on climate change has to be flexible and able to evolve to be successful, an Obama administration official said Aug. 2.
A flexible approach, such as allowing countries to develop their own legally binding targets, will be more successful than a stringent agreement to meet the global goal of limiting the rise in average temperature to less than 2 degrees centigrade above preindustrial levels, said Todd Stern, the State Department's special envoy for climate change, according to prepared remarks.
Stern spoke at Dartmouth College as part of its Leading Voices in U.S. Foreign Policy lecture series.
Such an agreement may not guarantee meeting the 2 degree goal, but insisting on an agreement that would guarantee the 2 degree limit will only lead to deadlock, he said.
“It is more important to start now with a regime that can get us going in the right direction and that is built in a way maximally conducive to raising ambition, spurring innovation, and building political will,” Stern said.
Countries at the U.N. climate summit in Durban, South Africa, in December agreed to develop a global emissions reduction agreement by the end of 2015, which would be effective in 2020 (35 INER 45, 1/4/12).
In a flexible agreement, countries could submit their own targets, and the public could provide comment after six-months to encourage countries to set more ambitious goals, Stern said.
The likelihood of all countries agreeing to a “highly prescriptive” climate agreement is low because countries will not agree to actions that could be seen to hinder growth and development, Stern said.
“The keys to making headway in this early conceptual phase of the new agreement is to be open to new ideas that can work in the real world and to keep our eyes on the prize of reducing emissions rather than insisting on old orthodoxies,” Stern said.
The agreement also has to be flexible enough to provide for future modifications, he said. Technological advancements may allow countries to make more aggressive emissions reductions commitments in the mid-2020s than in 2015, he said. Additionally, developing countries may advance to become top world economies by 2025, which would change the expectations of their action on climate change.
The world also needs to take action outside the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change and create informal groupings of countries to address climate change, Stern said.
Coalitions like this already exist, he said, citing a 2009 agreement of Group of 20 nations to phase out fossil fuel subsidies and a coalition launched by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in February to reduce short-lived climate pollutants such as methane, black carbon, and hydrofluorocarbons. More action along these lines is needed, Stern said.
Stern also urged greater national action to lower emissions, including the transformation of the U.S. energy sector to cleaner energy. Greater government investment in research and development of clean energy technologies may end up being the most important action the government takes because containing climate change likely depends on adopting technological advancements, Stern said.
He also called for national legislation, saying there is no substitute for legislation in spurring action on the level needed to transform the U.S. economy. He cited the need to make a case to Congress and the public about the benefits of moving to a clean energy economy, including a global competitive edge, cleaner air, and greater public health protections. He asked for greater vocal support of leaders in business and the military.
“Exactly what that response [to climate change] should be is a fair subject for debate, but if we can at least establish the priority of developing such a response, we'll have taken an important step forward,” Stern said.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)