Daily Tax Report: State provides authoritative coverage of state and local tax developments across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, tracking legislative and regulatory updates,...
By Che Odom
Governors, health-industry advocates and other state-level officials are beginning to put a price on the Affordable Care Act’s repeal—and it’s in the billions.
Estimates reflect deep losses for states such as California, Louisiana, Michigan, New Jersey, New York and Ohio.
In addition to Medicaid funds, states may see less revenue from sales and income taxes though loss of related health-care jobs, and hospital failures worry some state officials. A University of California Berkeley report released Dec. 20 said repeal would cost California $20.3 billion in gross domestic product, 209,000 jobs and $1.5 billion in tax revenue.
Such financial worries, along with an interest in keeping people insured, are driving governors to press President Donald Trump and Congress to save Obamacare, according to a governor of a state that didn’t adopt the ACA’s expansion of Medicaid.
Hundreds of millions, even tens of billions, of dollars in Medicaid funds are at stake for states if the ACA is repealed.
Thirty-one states plus Washington, D.C., opted to expand Medicaid programs under the Act, but most haven’t ventured a guess as to what continuing the programs would cost them.
Nationally, federal spending on health care for the non-elderly would be reduced by $109 billion in 2019 and by $1.3 trillion from 2019 to 2028 because of the elimination of the Medicaid expansion, premium tax credits and cost-sharing assistance, according to the left-leaning Urban Institute.
Some state estimates show a significant hit with an ACA repeal:
Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) and Gov. Rick Snyder (R) of Michigan are among the governors hoping to save at least elements of the Affordable Care Act.
According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Ohio could lose $3.5 billion in federal funding in 2019 and $42.2 billion between 2019 and 2028. And Michigan stands to go without $2.5 billion in federal money in 2019 and $30 billion between 2019 and 2028.
Uninsured in both would rise by the hundreds of thousands, according to the Urban Institute.
States, however, can’t estimate the full impact of repeal, H.D. Palmer, a spokesman for the state’s Department of Finance, the governor’s chief fiscal policy adviser, told Bloomberg BNA.
Though some legislation has been offered in Congress, just what would replace the Affordable Care Act hasn’t been explained by Trump, he said.
One governor, who doesn’t wish to be named because he hopes to maintain a good relationship with Trump during negotiations, told Bloomberg BNA that a concerted effort is underway by many of the nation’s governors to save the health care law.
“Repeal will have a detrimental effect on state budgets and economies,” he said. “We’re still hoping to work with him to find a solution.”
Kasich, Snyder, Gov. Brian Sandoval (R) of Nevada and Utah Gov. Gary Herbert (R) met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill last week to discuss saving Obamacare, but governors haven’t had much success meeting with the president, the un-named governor said.
Still, the effort to save Obamacare may be gaining headway.
Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Susan Collins (R-Me.), who met with governors, held a news conference Jan. 23 to introduce their proposal to keep Obamacare while providing an alternative program in which states may decide to participate. Under the Patient Freedom Act, states could also decide to adopt neither program.
It isn’t clear whether the legislation, which has a companion bill in the House from Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas), would receive backing from GOP leadership.
If Obamacare is repealed completely, Alaska and Massachusetts might consider raising taxes to cover some of the lost federal funding, while Kentucky, for one, isn’t likely do so, according to officials in those states.
Emily Beauregard, executive director for Kentucky Voices for Health, told Bloomberg BNA that Kentucky would lose hundreds of millions of dollars in federal support if the health law is repealed. But health care advocates in Kentucky don’t think elected officials there will support paying for displaced Medicaid beneficiaries because the state already finds itself in a difficult fiscal position.
“The federal government is unlikely to cover more than a fraction of the additional uncompensated care, so the rest would have to be a mixture of additional state/local spending, more uncompensated care funded by providers, and more unmet health care needs for the uninsured,” Urban Institute senior research analyst Matthew Buettgens told Bloomberg BNA.
About half to two-thirds of state budgets are already facing unexpected deficits because of lower-than-expected revenue this fall, Kim S. Rueben, project director of the Urban Institute’s state and local finance initiative, told Bloomberg BNA.
“Uncertainty about federal actions in general and health care specifically is a major concern for governors as they pass their budgets,” she said.
For example, Kentucky previously budgeted $265 million annually to support hospitals providing charity care, but that line item was eliminated under the ACA, Beauregard said.
“The state is going to have to do something about that,” she added. “That funding is not in our budget now. These are decisions our state legislature and governor would have to make. I’m not sure they would really restore that safety net.”
An already cash-strapped Louisiana would disproportionately suffer from the loss of funding compared to other states, because it has the third-highest adult poverty rate in the U.S.
“Louisiana gets more Medicaid dollars from the federal government than the rest of the U.S. because it has a large poor population,” Jan Moller, director of the independent, nonpartisan Louisiana Budget Project, told Bloomberg BNA.
Gov . John Bel Edwards, a Democrat, has said he’s concerned about the uncertainty the program now faces, but he doesn’t believe that Trump or Congress will repeal the coverage that millions are receiving across the country.
The state also banked about $180 million of federal funds into the current budget to cover new Medicaid enrollees the first year. Repeal of ACA would mean the loss of $4 billion in additional federal funding between 2019 and 2028, according to the Urban Institute.
The implications for the state budget are “extremely serious,” Edwards said, because of the widening deficit and a $1.5 billion fiscal cliff facing the state when temporary revenue-raising taxes fall off in 2018.
“Because we are a state that is very tied to the energy sector, we have an economic recession right now while the rest of the country is starting to recover from the great recession,” Moller said. “If we lose federal funding for health care, it’s only going to make [budget problems] worse.”
With assistance from Adrianne Appel in Boston, Tripp Baltz in Denver, Michael J. Bologna in Chicago, Nushin Huq in Houston, Leslie A. Pappas in Philadelphia, Paul Shukovsky in Seattle, and Gerald B. Silverman in Albany, New York.
To contact the reporter on this story: Che Odom in Washington at COdom@bna.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan C. Tuck at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)