By Chris Bruce
Ocwen Financial Corp. is pressing its bid for an early case conference on whether the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional ( Cons. Fin. protection Bureau v. Ocwen Fin. Corp. , S.D. Fla., 17-cv-80495, reply filed 5/9/17 ).
Ocwen’s filing in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida marks the latest of several fast-moving developments after the CFPB sued Ocwen in April for allegedly violating consumer protection laws in servicing loans of distressed borrowers.
Ocwen, which initially asked the court to schedule a conference to address the constitutionality of the CFPB, said May 9 the CFPB’s constitutional status “is a threshold question that arises ahead of, and separate from, the merits.”
That raises the possibility of a lightning-fast end to the dispute. “If Ocwen’s proposed briefing plan is adopted, there is a prospect the case can be over immediately,” Ocwen told Judge Kenneth A. Marra in its May 9 filing.
Ocwen and the CFPB have been arguing about Ocwen’s motion for a quick conference on the constitituional question since the case was filed.
The CFPB urged the court to deny that motion May 2, saying normal court procedures should govern the case, but Ocwen responded May 9, saying this case “is not a run-of-the-mill situation.” The Justice Department, in a separate case involving PHH Mortgage Corporation, has already said Dodd-Frank Act provisions that limit the president’s power to remove the CFPB director violate the U.S. Constitution.
The constitutional question should be tackled without delay, Ocwen said May 9. “The highest legal officer of the United States, the Attorney General, has concluded that the law establishing CFPB is in relevant part unconstitutional,” Ocwen’s filing said. “Under this extraordinary circumstance, Ocwen believes it would be productive and, indeed, important to have a discussion among the Court and the parties about how best to timely address the impact of CFPB’s unconstitutionality on the very viability of this case.”
Ocwen’s case highlights the ongoing importance of the PHH case, which is scheduled for argument May 24 before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In an October decision, two judges on a three-judge D.C. Circuit panel ruled against the CFPB, agreeing with PHH that the Dodd-Frank Act unconstitutionally limits removal of the CFPB director.
It’s that ruling that has made the Justice Department a potential factor in the Ocwen case, although it’s not yet involved in the matter. In December, the Justice Department lent its support to the CFPB’s petition for full D.C. Circuit review of the October ruling. In its December filing, the Justice Department said the CFPB’s petition should be granted, saying the October ruling was “at odds” with relevant U.S. Supreme Court precedent.
However, in March, the Justice Department took a different view, supporting PHH in the case and saying the Dodd-Frank Act’s removal restriction “is an unwarranted limitation on the President’s executive power.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Bruce in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Ferullo at MFerullo@bna.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)