Former Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell, who along with her campaign committee was ordered pay more than $30,000 for violating laws barring personal use of campaign money, has asked a federal judge for more time to decide whether to appeal or file additional motions.
Judge Leonard P. Stark of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware ordered the Federal Election Commission to respond to O’Donnell’s request by May 9, with a reply due from O’Donnell’s lawyers by May 12 ( FEC v. O’Donnell, D. Del., No. 15-17, order 5/28/17).
O’Donnell has battled FEC enforcement action for years over the personal-use issue. When O’Donnell refused to settle an administrative enforcement action, the FEC filed a civil enforcement lawsuit in federal court.
In 2010, the conservative activist, who identified with the Tea Party wing of the GOP, defeated veteran Rep. Mike Castle (R-Del.) in a Senate primary to become to Republican Senate nominee in Delaware. O’Donnell lost the general election that year to Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.).
An 11-page motion filed by O’Donnell’s lawyers on May 3 argued that FEC regulations that barred the candidate from using campaign money to pay her rent were unconstitutional. The motion said O’Donnell needed more time to hire appellate lawyers and file a notice of appeal and other motions.
The latest O’Donnell motion was signed by attorney Stephen M. Hoersting of the law firm The Gober Group PLLC, who has represented O’Donnell before the federal district court in Wilmington, Del. The motion said O’Donnell and her campaign committee “have always contended” that the FEC’s personal use regulation barring a campaign from paying a candidate’s rent violates the First Amendment.
“If the appellate courts follow the examples of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the $4,620 ordered disgorged plus $1,081.85 in pre-judgment interest and penalty of $25,000 should never be paid at all,” the motion contended. “It would be unjust to have the Defendants pay now and then get a refund years later.”
The Supreme Court rulings that the motion referred to struck down as unconstitutional long-standing limits on campaign contributions and spending.
“Ms. O’Donnell is taking steps to preserve her right to appeal,” Hoersting told Bloomberg BNA in an email. Beyond that, he said, she had no comment at this time.
Judge Stark last month ordered O’Donnell to disgorge $5,701.85 to the U.S. Treasury and said she and her campaign committee would be equally responsible for paying an additional $25,000 fine assessed by the FEC for violating the rules on personal use of campaign money.
The disgorgement order correlated to the rent payments saved by O’Donnell when she lived in an apartment paid for by her Senate campaign. The apartment also served as her campaign headquarters.
The judge, in a memorandum opinion, rejected O’Donnell’s contention that she acted in good faith and believed the Federal Election Commission rules allowed her actions.
Stark ruled last September that O’Donnell had illegally used campaign funds to pay her rent and utilities in 2010 and 2011. The judge rejected arguments by O’Donnell’s lawyers that legal restrictions on personal use of campaign funds are unconstitutional because campaign money is equivalent to free speech.
The liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed the original FEC enforcement complaint against O’Donnell. The FEC investigated the matter and filed a civil enforcement lawsuit against O’Donnell in 2015, alleging that she illegally used at least $20,000 in campaign funds for personal expenses. The expenses included rent and utilities for the Greenville, Del., townhouse where she lived and ran her campaign.
To contact the reporter on this story: Kenneth P. Doyle in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Hendrie at pHendrie@bna.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)