The ABA/BNA Lawyers’ Manual on Professional Conduct™ is a trusted resource that helps attorneys understand cases and decisions that directly impacts their work, practice ethically, and...
Two lawyers who shared office space were in the same firm and therefore didn’t have to comply with the ethics rule on fee-sharing among unaffiliated lawyers, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, decided Feb. 7 ( Brady v. Starke , 2017 BL 35962, Mo. Ct. App. W. Dist., No. WD79291, 2/7/17 ).
The circumstances of the lawyers’ office-sharing arrangement indicated to the public that they were in the same firm, so their fee-splitting agreement was enforceable without regard to whether it comported with Missouri Rule of Professional Conduct 4-1.5(e), Judge Cynthia L. Martin said.
The case might be a wake-up call for office-sharing lawyers to think through how their arrangement looks to the public. Lawyers who share space but don’t practice together should make the separate nature of their practices clear to visitors and clients, the decision suggests.
James Brady rented office space from Patrick Starke for about two years. The two lawyers agreed to split fees in cases they referred to each other, with the referring attorney getting 25 percent. After moving out Brady claimed their fee-sharing agreement was invalid because it didn’t meet the requirements of Rule 1.5.
The trial court found the agreement enforceable and awarded Starke his contractual share of a big fee from a personal injury case he had sent to Brady during their office-sharing agreement.
Rule 1.5(e) imposes several requirements for division of a fee between “lawyers who are not in the same firm.” Fee-sharing agreements that don’t comply with Rule 1.5(e) are unenforceable in Missouri, but the requirements in the rule don’t apply when the lawyers are in the same firm, the court of appeals said.
The court noted that Rule 4-1.0(c) defines the terms “firm” and “law firm.”
A comment to Rule 1.0(c) says that whether two or more lawyers constitute a firm can depend on the specific facts, and that “if they present themselves to the public in any way that suggests that they are a firm or conduct themselves as a firm, they should be regarded as a firm for purposes of the Rules.”
Brady argued that he and Starke weren’t in the same firm because they had separate bar listings, used individual office forms, didn’t advertise together, didn’t list each other on accounts or insurance, and had separate letterheads, websites, e-mail addresses and business cards.
However, the court said the record supported the trial court’s finding that Brady and Starke presented themselves to the public in a way that suggested they were a firm.
It wasn’t necessary for the trial court to find that the two attorneys “held themselves out” to be in the same firm, the court said.
The court pointed to the following evidence as support for finding that the lawyers publicly presented themselves as being in the same firm:
Jonathan Sternberg, Kansas City, Mo., represented Brady. William L. Carr, Independence, Mo., represented Starke.
To contact the reporter on this story: Joan C. Rogers in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: S. Ethan Bowers at firstname.lastname@example.org
Full text at http://src.bna.com/mbn.
Copyright © 2017 American Bar Association and The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)