Stay ahead of developments in federal and state health care law, regulation and transactions with timely, expert news and analysis.
By Bebe Raupe
June 3 — Supporters of an Ohio drug pricing ballot initiative may be able to get the measure before voters in November, thanks to a court ruling denying motions to block the effort ( Ohio Mfrs. Ass'n. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act, Ohio, No. 2016-0313, motions denied 6/2/16 ).
The Ohio Supreme Court June 2 rebuffed three procedural motions by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and other plaintiffs that would have extended litigation challenging the proposal to the point that backers wouldn’t have sufficient time to collect the 92,000 additional signatures needed to get it on the ballot.
According to Ohioans for Fair Drug Prices, the next round of signature collection will begin June 5 and run through July 6.
If approved by voters, the act would amend Ohio law to require state programs to pay the same, or less, for prescription medications as the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. California voters will vote on a similar measure this fall (14 PLIR 815, 6/3/16).
Michael Weinstein, president of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, which is sponsoring the measure, said in a prepared statement that the ruling is “a sign that the Court is not accepting PhRMA’s efforts to delay reaching a decision on the Ohio Drug Price Relief Act.”
The AHF said the court still has to rule on whether Ohioans for Fair Drug Prices will be granted an additional month beyond the July 6 signature-gathering deadline to compensate for a month-long delay in forwarding the issue on to the Ohio General Assembly.
The coalition backing the Ohio initiative submitted petitions to Ohio Secretary of State John Husted (R) in early January but, in an unprecedented move, he didn't forward it on to the legislature until February, after returning signature petitions for second review by all 88 county boards of election.
PhRMA spokeswoman Priscilla VanderVeer told Bloomberg BNA that the court’s action addresses procedural motions. “It was not a ruling on the merits of the legal action,” she said June 3.
The court did not dismiss any of the substantive arguments still pending, VanderVeer said, including circulator address problems and signature irregularities.
On Feb. 29, the Ohio Manufacturers’ Association, the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and PhRMA filed suit with the state's high court, challenging the petition initiative (14 PLIR 338, 3/4/16).
The lawsuit asks the Ohio Supreme Court for an order invalidating “part-petitions.” It alleges that certain part-petitions were circulated by individuals who listed a false permanent address; that part-petitions were altered by someone unauthorized to do so; that the petition effort employed ineligible felon circulators; and that over 1,400 part-petitions contain false circulator statements.
Jenny Camper, a spokeswoman for the three organizations, told Bloomberg BNA June 3, “We don’t know yet if the drug purchasing proposal will garner enough valid signatures to make the November 2016 ballot.
“What we do know is that tens of thousands of signatures were invalidated after a review of the issue’s first-round submission. The Supreme Court has not ruled on the merits of a pending legal action pointing to evidence of legal violations by paid circulators.”
Camper said that in California more than 60 groups—including state and national veterans’ organizations, patient advocates, business and labor groups and the California Medical Association—have expressed opposition to a drug pricing measure on that state's ballot.
A similar coalition will probably form in Ohio if the drug pricing measure makes it onto the ballot, Camper said, adding, “The proposal is unworkable, offers zero implementation guidance and would create a long-term quagmire of bureaucratic red tape and litigation.”
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Brian Broderick at email@example.com
The court's ruling is available at http://src.bna.com/fzG.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)