Bloomberg Law’s® Bankruptcy Law News publishes case summaries of the most recent important bankruptcy law decisions, tracks major commercial bankruptcies, and reports on developments in bankruptcy...
By Daniel Gill
General Motors’ bankrupt predecessor and hundreds of lenders embroiled in a $1.5 billion lawsuit received some settlement guidelines from a New York bankruptcy court ( Motors Liquidation Co. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.) , 2017 BL 339490, Bankr. S.D.N.Y., Chapter 11 Case No. 09-50026 (MG) (Jointly Administered) Case No. 09-00504 (MG), 9/26/17 ).
The Sept. 26 205-page opinion by Judge Martin Glenn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York resolves disputes involving about 40 assets associated with the automaker’s plants, including whether they are fixtures subject to the defendants’ valid security interest and their valuations.
But because there are more than 200,000 such disputed assets subject to the lawsuit, Glenn’s opinion was meant to serve as a template for the parties to settle the massive litigation.
The litigation arises from a $1.5 billion term loan “Old GM” borrowed from a group of large lenders, including JP Morgan Chase, Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch and Barclays Bank PLC. In all, there are over 500 sophisticated entity lenders. The loan was secured by substantially all of GM’s assets.
Because of a big blunder, in October 2008 the lenders accidentally recorded a UCC-3 termination statement effectively ending the perfection of their security interests. However, because the lenders had “Fixture Filings” in 26 counties where certain assets were located, the lenders claim to maintain a security interest in those assets which are fixtures.
GM still owed more than $1.4 billion on the term loan when it filed for Chapter 11 relief on June 1, 2009. GM obtained substantial debtor-in-possession financing in an order approved by the bankruptcy court. That order also authorized Old GM to repay the term loan, which it did.
In the bankruptcy, the debtor quickly sold its operating assets to “New GM,” leaving Old GM to wind up its estate.
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors sued the lenders to recover the repayment of the term loan, on grounds that they received more than the value of their secured collateral. The lawsuit is currently being prosecuted by a litigating trust formed for that purpose.
There are more than 200,000 assets at the center of the dispute. These assets include machinery, conveyors, robots and all manner of equipment associated with GM’s manufacturing plants.
In order to be resolved, it must be determined which assets are fixtures and subject to the lenders’ security interests, and the value of each fixture. The plaintiffs seek to recover whatever the lenders received in excess of those values.
“It is impractical, to say the least, to litigate issues with respect to each of the over 200,000 disputed assets,” Glenn said. “Hopefully, with the benefit of this opinion, the parties will be able to resolve the balance of their dispute through settlement,” he said.
The opinion goes through deep analysis of the elements for determining whether an asset is a fixture, and how it should be valued. Ultimately the court utilized a different calculus for different types of assets, like those that were sold to New GM and those that weren’t.
The defendant lenders were represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York. Binder & Schwartz LLP represented plaintiff Motors Liquidation Company avoidance action trust.
To contact the reporter on this story: Daniel Gill in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jay Horowitz at JHorowitz@bna.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)