Bloomberg Law for HR Professionals is a complete, one-stop resource, continuously updated, providing HR professionals with fast answers to a wide range of domestic and international human resources...
By Peter Menyasz
A recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruling granting C$141,000 ($105,750) in damages to a Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer in a civil damages claim for workplace harassment potentially opens the door for other employees to file civil claims for harassment damages, employment lawyers say ( Merrifield v. Attorney General, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, No. CV-13-00333733-00OT, 02/28/17).
The court found that RCMP officer Peter Merrifield was harassed and bullied by his superiors, damaging his reputation and career and causing severe emotional distress, Evan Campbell, an associate with Miller Thomson LLP in Guelph, Ontario, said Aug. 7. The finding is consistent with 2016 amendments to Ontario’s Occupational Health and Safety Act requiring employers to adopt and implement harassment policies and to investigate any harassment complaint that is, in the words of the statute, “appropriate in the circumstances,” Campbell told Bloomberg BNA.
“The decision reaffirms that all employers must take workplace harassment seriously and respond appropriately,” Campbell said. “The proper application of a workplace harassment program will greatly assist in preventing situations from reaching the threshold necessary to constitute the tort of harassment.”
The 900-paragraph ruling confirmed that the test for whether a case qualifies as harassment depends on whether the conduct was outrageous, was intended to cause emotional stress or had a general disregard for causing such stress, and caused severe or extreme emotional distress as a direct result of the harassment, Campbell said.
The government has appealed the ruling, Svetlana MacBain, an appeals case management officer with the Ontario Court of Appeal, said Aug. 8.
The federal police service’s treatment of Merrifield was outrageous and directly caused severe emotional distress, Justice Mary E. Vallee said Feb. 28 in the 179-page ruling, which upheld the availability of the tort of harassment and awarded C$100,000 ($75,000) in general damages and C$41,000 ($30,750) in special damages.
“Mr. Merrifield suffered from significant depression and post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of the actions taken by the RCMP,” Vallee said. “He was unable to work for various periods of time and at one point disengaged from his family and spent his days lying on a sofa. He did not bathe and developed bed sores.”
“Not only did Mr. Merrifield suffer from significant mental health issues as a result of the actions taken by the RCMP,” Vallee said, but “those actions also stained his reputation.”
The ruling noted that the RCMP adopted a policy to provide a safe and harassment-free workplace for its employees, but the policy wasn’t based on an undertaking to act in the best interests of its employees and members.
Merrifield, a successful member of the RCMP since 1998 who was involved in national security investigations and obtained convictions in several high-profile prosecutions, alleged that he started receiving adverse treatment from superiors after seeking in 2005 a nomination as a candidate for the federal Conservative Party. Merrifield alleged that his superiors made unjustified and unwarranted decisions about his work placements and that he was unfairly investigated and punitively transferred. The ruling supported those allegations and criticized the police force's ignoring of Merrifield’s harassment complaints as going “beyond all standards of what is right or decent.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Peter Menyasz in Ottawa at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Rick Vollmar at firstname.lastname@example.org
The ruling in Merrifield v. Attorney General is available here.
For more information on Ontario HR law and regulation, see the Ontario primer.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)