Money & Politics Report provides comprehensive behind-the-scenes coverage of campaign finance, lobbying, and government ethics issues at the federal, state, and local levels.
Aug. 31 — With a little more than two months to go until Election Day, super political action committees and other outside groups already have spent at least $137 million to impact the eight closest races that will determine control of the Senate, according to a new analysis.
The study by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law looked at outside spending in eight Senate races currently rated as toss-ups. It found $109 million in spending reported to the Federal Election Commission and another $28 million in spending announced by groups but not reported to the FEC.
Outside spending in 2016 is running significantly ahead of spending at a comparable point two years ago, the study noted. This cycle, the FEC-reported outside spending total of $109 million in the eight closest Senate races was almost 50 percent more than the $72 million in reported outside spending at the same point in 2014 in nine toss-up races.
“Outside spending in Senate elections is on track to shatter last cycle’s records,” said Ian Vandewalker, the Brennan Center counsel who authored the new analysis.
Even more important, he said, there is an increasing concentration of spending among a few major players, including groups closely linked to Senate Democratic and Republican leaders. Also among the top spenders are the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a super PAC linked to the Koch network of conservative donors. Both the Chamber and Koch network support Republicans in the key races.
The study looked at the eight Senate races listed as toss-ups by the Cook Political Report, which are in Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. All but the Nevada race involve a seat currently held by a Republican incumbent. Democratic victories in at least five of these races could tip control of the Senate to Democrats.
The Brennan Center collected FEC data on independent expenditures in primary and general elections through Aug. 12 and also relied on data from the Center for Responsive Politics as a reference. It looked only at expenditures made by an entity other than a candidate’s campaign committee, including party committees, though parties were excluded from some parts of the analysis.
Vandewalker said the rise of outside spending—including money from groups that don't disclose their donors—showed the ease of circumventing limits on direct contributions to candidates and parties and also showed how easy it is to conceal donors. This highlights the risk that candidates and outside groups are illegally coordinating their activities, he said.
Super PACs must report their donors to the FEC, but nonprofit groups don't disclose their funding sources. Nonprofits can sponsor political ads directly or provide untraceable money to super PACs.
“A large part of the campaign finance system is being outsourced to these groups,” Vandewalker told Bloomberg BNA in a phone interview. He noted that candidates in the most expensive races often are being outspent by outside groups, which can raise unlimited amounts from wealthy individuals, corporation and unions.
The post-Watergate campaign finance laws enacted in the 1970s were based on contribution limits and disclosure of sources of campaign money, Vandewalker said, but these principles have eroded under the current system. Regulations on independent political spending have been struck down by court decisions over the last decade, including the 2010 Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC.
The Brennan Center supports stronger regulation of campaign financing. Vandewalker said the center's new analysis indicated that “voters are right to see effective campaign finance reform as one of America’s biggest—and most necessary—challenges today.”
The latest patterns in spending show continued growth in “shadow parties”—groups closely linked to Democratic and Republican leaders, according to the Brennan Center study. These include the super PAC Senate Majority PAC on the Democratic side and the nonprofit group One Nation and super PAC Senate Leadership Fund on the Republican side.
The Brennan Center found that One Nation has announced spending of nearly $22 million in spending in key Senate races—the most of any outside group—but has not reported any spending to the FEC. The group has been able to avoid FEC reporting by avoiding words of express advocacy for or against candidates in its messages and sponsoring political ads outside the reporting period for “electioneering communications” aired close to an election.
Meanwhile, the Republican super PAC, the Senate Leadership Fund, which has links to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), has collected large contributions but has reported relatively little spending so far. The Republican super PAC's spending is expected to pick up as the election draws closer, the Brennan Center study suggested.
The Senate Leadership Fund and One Nation both were created in 2015 and have ties to American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS—groups founded by top Republican adviser Karl Rove that were among the biggest pro-GOP outside spenders in previous election cycles, according to the Brennan Center. Steven Law, a former top aide to McConnell, now heads the Crossroads groups, Senate Leadership Fund and One Nation.
The second largest outside spender in key Senate races is the Democratic super PAC Senate Majority PAC, the Brennan Center found. The super PAC, which has links to Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), has reported $19.6 million in spending in key Senate races. Reid has personally solicited donations for the Senate Majority PAC, according to the Brennan Center.
The next biggest spender was Freedom Partners Action Fund, a super PAC funded by the network of conservative donors linked to Charles and David Koch, who head Koch Industries Inc. The Koch super PAC has reported spending $18.1 million in key Senate races, so far, the Brennan Center found. Its biggest donor is Charles Koch, who has given $6 million.
Close behind is the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation's largest business lobby, which has spent $16.6 million on the key Senate races, according to the Brennan Center. As a nonprofit trade association, the Chamber doesn't disclose the funding sources for its political ads, though its members include many of the nation's largest corporations.
As in previous elections, much of the outside spending in the current campaign is not transparent, the Brennan Center found. Reported spending funneled through groups that don’t reveal their donors, sometimes called “dark money,” amounted to $26.8 million, or one-quarter of total outside spending in toss-up Senate races, with pro-Republican groups more likely to hide their donors.
Adding expenditures detailed in press releases and news reports but not in FEC data increases total expenditures by groups that hide their donors to at least $55.4 million. That was 40 percent of the approximately $137 million total of both FEC-reported spending and spending not reported to the FEC, the Brennan Center found.
To contact the reporter on this story: Kenneth P. Doyle in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Heather Rothman at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)