Payroll on Bloomberg Tax is built to get you to the right answer faster and more efficiently. Get all the payroll intelligence you need with Bloomberg Tax expert analysis, perspectives and...
Nearly 300,000 comments were filed on a proposed Labor Department rule that would increase the salary threshold needed to exempt employees from overtime pay.
The proposed rule (RIN 1235–AA11) would more than double the salary threshold for overtime eligibility under the Fair Labor Standards Act to $970 a week in 2016, or $50,440 a year. To qualify for the exemption under the current regulations, an employee must have duties that are managerial or supervisory or require creativity or advanced knowledge, in addition to meeting the salary threshold.
In 2004, the Bush administration raised the salary threshold to $455 a week from $155, or $23,660 a year. The administration also eliminated variations in the duties test, depending on salary level in favor of a single, uniform test for workers paid more than the threshold.
More than 5 million additional workers would become eligible for overtime pay under the 2015 proposal, Labor Secretary Thomas Perez said June 30 during a White House teleconference after the plan was introduced. The goal, the administration said, was to ensure that an exemption intended for highly paid executives was not used to underpay low-level supervisors. The proposal also calls for the salary threshold to be indexed so inflation would not erode employee gains.
The comments reflected the schism generated by the proposal. Many comments noted the benefits of an increase in overtime pay, but others highlighted the negative effects the proposal might have on the workplace. Employers with limited revenue said the proposal, if adopted, would lead to increased employer payroll taxes and workers' compensation premium.
The retail and restaurant industries, where many workers are classified as managers or assistant managers although they earn modest salaries, were expected to be affected the most by the proposal.
The National Retail Federation, which represents stores, grocers, wholesalers, chain restaurants and Internet retailers, opposed the proposal, saying it could curtail the careers of middle managers and damage employee morale in the industry.
The attempt to increase wages “will end up having major negative consequences for employees, employers and the economy as a whole,” the group said. “If the proposed changes become final, NRF’s research predicts that the changes would result in many managers, who have enjoyed the benefits and sense of pride associated with exemption status, becoming hourly workers. As hourly workers, many of the affected employees would receive reduced compensation and benefits and be diverted from career opportunities that are a path to middle-class success.”
“This extreme increase in the salary level is unnecessary and would have severe consequences for many retail and restaurant employees and their careers and their customers,” the group said. “It is simply a bad idea that is highly inappropriate in today’s volatile economy.”
The National Restaurant Association suggested an alternative salary threshold. The association said $657 a week would more accurately reflect the balance between salaried managers and hourly restaurant employees.
The 2004 salary threshold for exempt status “is now too low and should be raised,” the association said. “However, the department’s proposed salary level is not the appropriate level for our diverse industry, especially given regional and local variations in salaries paid due to sharp differences in the cost of living in the United States.”
In the restaurant industry, “salaried employees enjoy a number of benefits not available to hourly employees,” the association said. “Thus, in addition to getting paid a salary regardless of the fact that they are not working over 40 hours a week, these newly overtime-protected employees could lose flexibility as well as benefits, including substantive bonuses, paid vacation, flex time, paid holidays, 401k [plans] with employer match and health insurance.”
The association also said that “imposing a long duties test, particularly one similar to what is found in California, would lead to less clarity and more litigation, which the department states it would like to avoid.”
The association also sent 479 comments from member restaurants. Although signed by the restaurant owners, the responses were based on a template.
The HR Policy Association, which said it represents senior human resource executives in more than 360 of the largest U.S. companies, said the proposed rule would “at best, deliver only marginal benefits regarding pay, while significantly reducing workplace flexibility for millions of employees who are increasingly embracing the benefits the digital workplace can bring to one's work-life balance.”
Nondiscretionary bonuses should count toward a portion of the standard salary level test, the association said, adding that the Labor Department should not make any changes to the duties tests without first proposing specific regulatory language.
About 6,000 comments submitted to the Labor Department in response to the proposed rule are available for review at www.regulations.gov.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Trimarchi in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)