Bloomberg Law: Privacy & Data Security brings you single-source access to the expertise of Bloomberg Law’s privacy and data security editorial team, contributing practitioners,...
New SEC guidance demonstrates the publicly traded company regulator will continue to focus on cybersecurity and provides insights on the seriousness of cyberthreats, the safeguards policies and procedures a company should have in place, and potential insider trading issues in the wake of data breaches, the author writes.
By Andrew Serwin
Andrew Serwin is a partner in Morrison & Foerster LLP’s global privacy and data security practice group in San Diego.
By Andrew Serwin
The Securities and Exchange Commission recently released Guidance regarding cybersecurity issues that provides further clarity regarding the Commission’s Guidance on cybersecurity and public companies. The Commission essentially provided additional guidance regarding four topics:
The Commission then provided an overview of the rules it believed required disclosure of cybersecurity issues, and a summary of the Commission’s statements follows.
The Commission first noted its view that companies need to consider whether they have an obligation to make disclosures as part of companies’ required registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as the periodic and current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In the periodic report context, the Commission noted its view that companies should provide “timely and ongoing information” regarding cybersecurity—specifically material cybersecurity risks and incidents that “trigger disclosure obligations” in these reports, which include Forms 10-K and 10-Q. The Commission also noted its view that cybersecurity is a relevant factor for the disclosure requirements that result from a company’s obligations under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act to “disclose all material facts” so as not to make the statements misleading. The Commission also noted its view that Form 8-K and Form 6-K can be used to provide current reports regarding the “occurrence and consequences of cybersecurity incidents.”
While noting areas where disclosures should be made, in the Commission’s view, was the focus of this Guidance, the Commission recognized some of the inherent limitations on companies that are faced with disclosure obligations—notably the problem of disclosing information that could compromise security. The Commission specifically stated that a company should not “make detailed disclosures that could compromise its cybersecurity efforts…”, so companies must try to walk the line of make sufficient disclosures, but not disclose information that could ultimately harm the company.
The Commission also noted that the timing of disclosures may be impacted by the time it takes a company to understand the implications of an incident, as well as the fact that a company may cooperate with law enforcement and that cooperation may impact the timing of disclosures. However, it appears that the Commission’s view is that the mere existence of an investigation would not necessarily justify delaying disclosure once the incident is understood. The Commission also noted that companies have, in its view, a duty to correct prior disclosures when there are developments that make the prior disclosures untrue, or that are missing a material fact that is necessary to make the disclosures not misleading. This obligation caused the Commission to state that companies should consider whether new facts require a refresh of prior disclosures. These disclosures, the Commission said, should be “tailored” to the company’s particular cybersecurity risks and incidents.
The Commission also addressed companies’ disclosure obligations for risk factors, including in the context of acquisitions. The Commission suggested that it would be “helpful” for companies to consider certain issues when making risk factor disclosures:
One of the main conclusions the Commission drew based upon these disclosures, as well as the risks it perceived regarding cybersecurity was that policies and procedures regarding cybersecurity are “key elements of enterprise-wide risk management….” This includes disclosure policies, but in the Commission’s view it goes beyond that and includes escalation criteria, among other issues.
The Commission also addressed issues regarding insider trading, noting that it had particular concerns in this context.
Ultimately, the new Guidance demonstrates that the Commission continues to be focused on cybersecurity and this focus will not wane in the near term. The Guidance provides further details regarding the Commission’s thinking in prior Guidance, and provides further thoughts from the Commission regarding the seriousness of the threat, the policies and procedures a company should have, in the Commission’s view, as well as the issues associated with insider trading.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Donald Aplin at email@example.com
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)