Is the U.S. Supreme Court stifling innovation in haircutting? Or has it kept the world safe for aspiring stylists with a pair of scissors and a dream?
The high court’s rulings on what constitutes patentable subject matter have been controversial, to say the least. Critics say the two-part Alice/Mayo analysis has stifled software and biotechnology innovation by resulting in the invalidation of many patents in those fields.
Last week, innovation in the not-so-high-tech world of haircutting was also on the cutting board.
Under Alice/Mayo, the first step of the analysis determines if a patent claim recites an ineligible concept, such as a natural law, natural phenomena or an abstract idea. If it does, the second step determines if a claim has enough additional elements to go beyond that basic concept.
Applying that test, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled April 22 that a hair-cutting invention that assigns hair designs to balance head shape can’t be patented because it covers an abstract idea.
In re: Brown relates to U.S. Patent Application No. 09/795,210 claiming a hair-cutting method that involves:
The court found the claims so broad that they cover the idea of picking a hairstyle to balance head shape, and that the method can be performed purely in one’s head. Applying the second Alice/Mayo step, it rejected the argument that the step in the invention directing a user to use scissors to cut hair added the “inventive concept” needed to make an abstract idea patentable.
In its ruling, the court agreed with the Patent and Trademark Office, which rejected the application on the grounds that the claims were not patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
Though this “invention” failed to pass muster, there have been patented inventions that do advance haircutting technology. One of the most noteworthy (or notorious, depending on your perspective) is the Flowbee, the hair-cutting tool that attaches to a vacuum cleaner.
Alas, the Flowbee patent (U.S. Patent No. 4,679,322) has expired. But it serves as a reminder that innovation in haircutting is possible. As for software and biotech, debate will, no doubt, rage on.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)