Rely on Occupational Safety & Health ReporterSM for full news coverage and documentation of federal and state workplace safety and health programs, standards, legislation,...
Peabody Energy asked a federal appeals court to overturn its citation for improperly sealing ventilation stopping, which separates intake air from return air, at a Colorado coal mine.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit will decide whether Peabody’s use of polyurethane spray foam to seal the perimeter of a concrete block ventilation stopping at the company’s Foidel Creek Mine amounts to “a traditionally accepted method” ( Peabody Twentymile Mining v. Sec’y of Labor , 10th Cir., No. 17-09540, 8/25/17 ).
A Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission administrative law judge affirmed the Aug. 6, 2014, citation alleging Peabody Twentymile Mining’s use of foam violated federal regulation 30 C.F.R. 75.333(e)(1)(i).
More than a thousand such stoppings, which prevent gasses from entering escapeways, are used in the mine, according to the review commission. Peabody sold 2.6 million tons of coal from the northwest Colorado mine in 2016.
Jackson Kelly PLLC, Pittsburgh, which represents Peabody, declined to comment to Bloomberg BNA.
Peabody’s Mine Safety and Health Administration-approved ventilation plan recognizes two types of stoppings—temporary metal panel stoppings and permanent concrete block stoppings. Temporary metal panels may be sealed with polyurethane foam, a non-strength-enhancing material, according to MSHA.
Peabody used the foam to seal the edges of both temporary and permanent stoppings. Its 2011 ventilation plan didn’t limit the use of the foam to temporary stoppings, and the company had used the foam since 1983. MSHA finalized the “traditionally accepted method” regulation in 1996.
Despite Peabody’s use and MSHA’s lack of enforcement during prior inspections, the agency issued a citation for this violation, among others.
Prior or longtime use of a method within a mine is irrelevant to whether the company built the stoppings according to “traditionally accepted methods,” Administrative Law Judge David P. Simonton wrote. He assessed a $162 fine for the citation.
Two commissioners said they would affirm Simonton’s ruling, while two said they would reverse and vacate the citation. As a result, Simonton’s decision was affirmed.
The review commission is currently operating with four members rather than five.
Peabody filed the petition in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Aug. 25.
Its arguments before the Tenth Circuit may track the opinion authored by Chairman William Althen and Commissioner Michael Young, who would have reversed Simonton’s ruling.
“In short, because MSHA traditionally accepted this method—both implicitly through allowing the longstanding, widespread practice at the Foidel Creek Mine, and explicitly through approving the practice in Peabody Twentymile’s ventilation control plan—it was a ‘traditionally accepted method,’” they wrote.
If the term were ambiguous, the secretary’s interpretation of the regulation is not entitled to deference, the chairman and commissioner wrote. Here, the secretary is interpreting his own earlier interpretation in the preamble, and such interpretations cannot receive deference under the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1997 Auer decision.
The Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Arlington, Va., represents the secretary.
To contact the reporter on this story: Lars-Eric Hedberg in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Rachael Daigle at firstname.lastname@example.org
The petition for review filed by Peabody Twentymile Mining in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Peabody Twentymile Mining v. Secretary of Labor is available at http://src.bna.com/r2J.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)