Daily Report for Executives provides in-depth coverage of unfolding legislative, regulatory, and judicial news from the nation’s capital, the states, and around the world. This daily news service...
Disagreement over how commercial airline co-pilots can meet training requirements continues to bog down Senate legislation, and the controversy spilled into an Oct. 31 hearing for a National Transportation Safety Board nominee.
The issue emerged in June when Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee Chairman John Thune (R-S.D.) amended his committee’s Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill (S. 1405) to create greater flexibility for co-pilots to reach the federally mandated 1,500 hours of in-flight training—such as counting some time in a simulator instead of in the air.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) warned Republicans at the time that he would block the bill with the training language included. The bill hasn’t come to the floor since being approved in committee along party lines with the provision, and Schumer told reporters Oct. 31 he and Thune have made no progress on resolving the matter.
Airline industry groups claiming a pilot shortage should look no further than the low pay some co-pilots earn on small, regional airlines, Schumer said.
During the Oct. 31 Commerce Committee confirmation hearing, Democrats asked NTSB nominee Bruce Landsberg to explain earlier remarks in which he suggested 1,500 hours of in-air training might not be necessary.
Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), a former military pilot, asked: “Are you committed to providing independent recommendations for pilot and first-officer training certification requirements that would achieve the safest civil aviation system, not what is the safest system balanced against industry claims of pilot shortages, just simply what is safest?”
Landsberg said he would, but also maintained that 1,500 hours may not be the magic number. He said he favors high standards but wants them to be performance-based.
“I believe in the performance of pilots and I think that setting an arbitrary number is not necessarily the best way to go,” said Landsberg, former president of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) Air Safety Institute.
He pointed to military pilots, who receive 200 to 300 hours of training but have high performance standards, as an example.
Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), Commerce Committee ranking member, told Bloomberg Government no progress has been made on resolving the training issue, consistent with Schumer’s comments.
Thune sounded an optimistic note, however.
“We’ve got a little bit of time, we are trying to work it out,” he told Bloomberg Government. “We’d like to get to a place where we have a solution that works. So we’ll be working with the administration and with [the Transportation Department, which includes the FAA] on that and we’ll see where it end up.”
The FAA’s six-month authorization extension runs through March 31.
The pilot training controversy faded after the markup as the focus shifted to the House’s FAA bill (H.R. 2997) and its contentious air traffic control spinoff provision. However, the House bill’s lack of movement has prompted Thune to aim for passage of his own bill, possibly in a year-end vehicle or early in the new year.
“I don’t want another extension of the FAA bill,” Thune said.
Thune called on the FAA in an Oct. 25 letter to release a report from an industry working group that addresses alternative training options for co-pilots. The agency released the report the next day.
The Air Carrier Training Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) offered detailed proposals on how pilots could earn an Airline Transport Pilot (ATP) certificate with fewer than 1,500 hours of in-flight training. The recommendations suggest allowing pilots with military training or who hold bachelor’s degrees and have completed a certain amount of aviation and aviation-related coursework to apply that experience toward their ATP certificate.
The ARC’s suggestions are significant, Thune said in his letter, because the FAA has “effectively used [ARC’s findings] to inform its rulemaking activities.”
“I believe that ongoing policy discussions would be greatly informed if the public had access to the recommendations of this expert working group,” Thune wrote.
— With assistance from Nancy Ognanovich
To contact the reporter on this story: Shaun Courtney in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Hendrie at pHendrie@bna.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)