Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
Swallowing small pieces of plastic in water found in lakes, rivers and oceans may harm fish and other aquatic organisms. How harmful is a question that scientists say needs further research.
The global production of plastics in 2014 was 311 million tons. In 2010 alone, between 4.8-12.7 million metric tons of plastic found their way into our oceans, according to a 2016 United Nations Environment Programme report.
“Plastics in the waterways are increasing. There is reason to believe that these tiny pieces of plastics could have a substantial impact on the natural environment and on the aquatic life,” said Sherri Mason, an environmental chemistry professor at the State University of New York at Fredonia whose research uncovered microplastics inside 25 species of Great Lakes fish including perch and trout.
Mason told Bloomberg BNA the risk of chemical exposure posed to fish by swallowing plastics that adsorb pollutants on their surface like a sponge is something that requires further examination, funding and attention at the national level.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s white paper summarizing the latest research on the risks to aquatic life from ingesting plastics provides the national attention the issue warrants, Mason said.
The paper acknowledges the potential for plastics to be a source of contaminants, from both the chemical constituents of the manufactured plastic itself and contaminants sorbed onto the surface of plastics in the aquatic environment. Given this potential, the EPA said “there is growing concern about the toxicological impacts of chemicals associated with plastics on aquatic organisms, as well as, aquatic-dependent wildlife, such as seabirds.”
The EPA said the following questions need to be resolved to understand the extent of harm posed by plastic pollution in water:
He pointed to the Baldwin study that documented the exposure concentration of microplastics in Great Lakes fish, but failed to mention that microplastics reported per cubic meter equates to 1,000 liters.
“This paper supports the numbers I came up with and means the exposure to microplastics in the worst areas cannot be an ecological risk,” Burton told Bloomberg BNA.
Mason, who was a co-author of the Baldwin paper, is a bit perplexed by Burton’s critique of scientists who want to investigate the linkage between microplastics and chemical exposure. On the one hand, Burton said there’s no evidence that microplastics are harmful, a conclusion that Mason said would require funding and studies to prove. On the other hand, Burton criticizes scientists for wanting to study whether there is a potential for harm, Mason said.
“If there isn’t data to indicate there is an ecological consequence, there also isn’t data to indicate there isn’t,” Mason said. “We need funding and time to do those studies.”
The San Francisco Estuary Institute, an ecosystem and aquatic science nonprofit that helps implement the bay area’s regional water quality monitoring program, plans to examine the extent of microplastic pollution problem in the Bay and surrounding ocean through a two-year grant they have just received, Rebecca Sutton, the institute’s senior scientist, told Bloomberg BNA.
The American Chemistry Council’s Keith Christman agrees that plastics don’t belong in a marine environment, though as marketing director for plastic products he is quick to point out to Bloomberg BNA the vital role plastics play in society.
Christman pointed to the 2016 Koelmans’ study, which the EPA paper also highlighted, that discusses the many exposure pathways to which marine animals are exposed to persistent organic pollutants. This study finds that bioaccumulation of chemical pollutants found on plastics inside aquatic life is one of many pathways by which exposure can occur. The other pathways include direct chemical exposure via water, sediment, or ingestion of contaminated prey.
The EPA maintains throughout the paper that the challenge with field studies, such as the Koelmans’ study is that it is difficult to definitively link bioaccumulation of chemicals to the ingestion of plastics versus other uptake pathways.
The UNEP too in its 2016 report on marine plastic debris and microplastics concluded from the limited evidence present that the microplastics in seafood do not currently represent a human health risk “although many uncertainties remain” about the potential risk that such products could pose.
The plastics industry is aware of the potential that bioaccumulation of chemicals could pose, and has taken steps both globally and domestically to reduce plastic pollution, according to Christman.
In 2011, the Plastics Industry Association as well as the American Chemistry Council joined 67 other plastics groups and allied industry associations in 35 countries in signing a global declaration to voluntarily take steps to reduce marine litter, including plastics. Christman said the American Chemistry Council has been involved in the international state-of-the-science report on microplastics.
“The industry itself is constantly involved in research around innovation, working to reduce impacts of plastics and improve their environmental performance, making them more recyclable,” Christman said.
The EPA made it very clear to Bloomberg BNA that it has no plans for attempting to regulate plastics, saying its voluntary Trash-Free Waters is working well in states. The program that works in concert with local officials and volunteers is designed to reduce the huge volumes of trash entering the nation’s waters. The agency dispelled all questions about its intention, saying the paper’s goal was to provide the latest research, and that’s it.
The Center for Biological Diversity, which successfully advocated for a federal legislation in 2014 to phase out the use of plastic microbeads in face washes, toothpastes, said the key is to eliminate the use of plastic altogether because plastic pollution is turning the ocean into a “toxic mess.”
“It’s horrible,” said Abel Valdivia, the center’s ocean scientist, told Bloomberg BNA. “We agree with the EPA that more research into ocean plastic pollution is needed. But we also must attack this problem now by choosing tap water over plastic water bottles and taking steps to keep microplastics found in clothing and beauty products out of our oceans.
To contact the reporter on this story: Amena H. Saiyid in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
An EPA state-of-the science white paper on the chemical toxicity of plastic pollution on aquatic life is available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-12/documents/plastics-aquatic-life-report.pdf
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)