For the professional edge in your day-to-day practice, rely on the most timely, objective reporting on significant developments, trends, and emerging patterns in criminal law today—Criminal Law...
An officer who shot to death a burglary victim can’t be sued, a federal appeals court decided April 19 ( Thomas v. City of Columbus , 2017 BL 127684, 6th Cir., No. 16-3375, 4/19/17 ).
The officer acted “objectively reasonably when he used deadly force here—even if facts beyond his knowledge meant that he actually faced no threat,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in an opinion by Judge David W. McKeague.
Destin Thomas called 911 to report an ongoing burglary at his apartment. After wrestling with one of the burglars, Thomas left his apartment holding a gun.
He and one of the suspects ran toward an officer and got within 10 feet of him in seconds. The officer fired two shots, both striking Thomas, who died.
His father, William, sued the officer under 42 U.S.C. §1983, which allows individuals to sue cities and their officials for constitutional violations.
William Thomas alleged the officer used excessive force in violation of his son’s right to be free from unreasonable seizures—a Fourth Amendment violation.
The police officer moved for summary judgment, asserting qualified immunity as a defense.
The qualified immunity doctrine arises in cases brought against public employees under Section 1983 and protects them from civil lawsuits. The doctrine protects government officials unless they violated clearly established rights.
There was no issue as to whether Destin Thomas had a gun. The only issue was whether he raised or pointed it toward the officer.
However, the Sixth Circuit said in throwing out the case that qualified immunity was appropriate even if Thomas hadn’t raised his gun.
“The Fourth Amendment only requires officers to act reasonably on the information they have; it does not require them to perceive a situation accurately,” the court explained.
The court acknowledged that the officer violated department procedures by approaching the apartment without backup, thus increasing the likelihood of having to use force.
“But those decisions were not seizures,” the court said. “Their reasonableness is not at issue.”
Instead, the court reviewed the officer’s decisions at the moment he decided to use deadly force.
It pointed out that the officer was responding to a dangerous call in a high-crime area. Further, the court explained that two people exited the apartment and ran toward the officer, one with a gun, closing the distance rapidly.
“Given these facts, a reasonable officer would perceive a significant threat to his life in that moment,” the court said. Thus, the decision to fire was “objectively reasonable.”
Judges Richard Allen Griffin and Raymond M. Kethledge joined in the opinion.
Nicholas A. DiCello, of Spangenberg, Shibley & Liber LLP, Cleveland, argued for Thomas. Timothy Joseph Mangan, of the City Attorney’s Office, Columbus, Ohio, argued for the defendants.
To contact the reporter on this story: Robert Wilhelm in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: C. Reilly Larson at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)