Stay current on changes and developments in corporate law with a wide variety of resources and tools.
By Jacob Rund
Could Wall Street firms such as Apollo Global Management LLC and Carlyle Group LP really have some of the smallest pay gaps between their CEOs and average workers?
That’s the question that has some consumer and worker advocates raising their eyebrows as reports required by the Securities and Exchange Commission disclose for the first time how much CEOs make compared with median workers.
Showing some of the narrowest gaps are publicly traded private equity firms where top executives have an estimated net worth in the billions of dollars, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
Bartlett Naylor, Public Citizen’s financial policy advocate, said the private equity firms’ narrow ratios present an “optics problem,” especially for academics and researchers collecting compensation data to evaluate industry trends.
These ratios “may give the illusion that there is greater equity in the investment sector than there actually is,” Naylor said. “I think it warrants scrutiny.”
The narrow ratios “certainly strike us as odd,” AFL-CIO Investment Office Director Heather Slavkin Corzo said.
Naylor and Slavkin Corzo told Bloomberg Law their organizations are taking a harder look at the private equity pay data that’s been disclosed. Public Citizen is contemplating whether to pursue a course of action, including raising the issue with regulators, Naylor said.
The SEC, under a mandate from the Dodd-Frank Act, now requires most exchange-listed companies to calculate and report the median compensation of their employees and compare it to their CEO’s pay. The closer a company’s ratio is to 1-to-1, the less disparity is assumed to exist between its CEO and median worker’s annual compensation.
The bulk of private equity executives’ income is often tied to returns on investments or profit-sharing arrangements, as opposed to the multimillion-dollar compensation packages often received by CEOs of public companies.
Apollo, among the most well-known of U.S. private equity firms, reported a 1-to-1 ratio in a Feb. 12 filing. Co-founder and CEO Leon Black received $251,888 in salary and other compensation during 2017, about $2,000 more than Apollo’s median employee, the company said.
Black elects to take a $100,000 salary, no bonus, and no cut of any deal profits, but derives most of his wealth from the company’s dividends—the same per-share amount given to public shareholders. In total, he received $191.3 million last year from his base compensation and dividends, up 45 percent from 2016, Apollo reported.
Black owns 92.7 million, or 31.5 percent, of the New York-based asset manager’s class A shares. And his net worth is about $6.1 billion, according to Bloomberg’s Billionaires Index.
Apollo’s median employee compensation of $249,750 doesn’t, and isn’t required to, include dividends—a key factor behind the 1-to-1 pay ratio.
Carlyle reported a 1.4-to-1 pay ratio for 2017 in a Feb. 15 filing. The company’s median employee compensation was $201,315, while the pay of each of its three co-principal executives totaled $281,750, it said.
Carlyle’s compensation arrangement with co-founders David Rubenstein, William Conway, and Daniel D’Aniello is comparable to Apollo’s arrangement with Black. The three men take a base salary and get the bulk of their income from company dividends.
Carlyle said in its filing that Rubenstein received $66.3 million in dividends during 2017, while Conway and D’Aniello each got $62.7 million. The firm did report that its future pay ratios will “differ substantially,” as its new co-CEOs agreed to pay packages with “additional significant elements of compensation.”
Under the SEC rules, companies must use a “consistently applied” compensation measure to calculate median employee pay and develop their ratios. The commission provides considerable flexibility for the selection of a median employee, including a partial exemption some firms can use to exclude a small pocket of their non-U.S. workforce.
Not all private equity firms are reporting narrow pay spreads.
KKR & Co. LP reported a 429-to-1 ratio in a Feb. 23 regulatory filing. It said its median employee compensation totaled $265,000, while its two co-CEOs each earned more than $113 million.
Both Henry Kravis and George Roberts earned a $300,000 base salary, and each received about $67.8 million in carried interest, or a share of investment profits. Carlyle and Apollo’s top executives don’t receive such carried interest payments.
Matthew Goforth, senior governance adviser with corporate research firm Equilar Inc., said he expects 1-to-1 and similar ratios will be few and far between, and “confined to special cases.”
Nonetheless, supporters of pay ratio requirements are concerned that narrow ratios, such as those reported by Apollo and Carlyle, may mislead or confuse investors and the general public.
“Dividends, to any common understanding, are as real as compensation” as if the board was awarding them that money, Public Citizen’s Naylor said. “To the extent they are claiming their officers are making the median pay,” that’s “absurd.”
But companies’ pay ratio disclosures, including those of Apollo and Carlyle, provide more insight into compensation structures, Naylor said.
Pay ratio data is “meant to give investors more information to analyze pay practices,” Slavkin Corzo said. “If we aren’t getting that information, we aren’t going to be able to use it” for its intended purpose, which, she said, includes informing stockholder say-on-pay votes.
An Apollo representative declined to comment for this article.
“Carlyle disclosed compensation information as required and believes it is clear,” the firm said in a statement to Bloomberg Law.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jacob Rund at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Yin Wilczek at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)