From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
A controversial, politically conservative organization allegedly looking to dig up dirt on a Michigan teachers union scored a partial victory Dec 27.
A federal judge denied the American Federation of Teachers-Michigan’s request to block Project Veritas from using or publishing information it obtained from the union. AFT says Project Veritas used an operative posing as a college student seeking an internship to perform surveillance and gather private union documents.
The group gained the information through deceptive tactics “strikingly similar” to those recently employed by Project Veritas to try to infiltrate the Washington Post, union attorney Mark Cousens told Bloomberg Law Dec. 27.
Marisa Jorge, who allegedly gave a false name to the union, obtained internal documents including personal contact information for union members at a local school and union grievance documents, according to the AFT. The union said she also took notes during a bargaining session between the AFT and a school. “We used commonly available search methods and concluded the person is indeed a woman name Marisa Jorge,” Cousens said. “She appears to have graduated from Liberty University and we believe she’s been known by other names.”
Paul Mersino, Project Veritas’ lawyer, said the organization hasn’t yet filed court documents to admit or deny the allegations of an undercover infiltration.
The Post reported earlier this year that Project Veritas, which is run by conservative provocateur James O’Keefe, sent people posing as journalists to have candid conversations with and obtain information from Post reporters in an effort to undermine the newspaper’s credibility. A Project Veritas employee also approached the newspaper with false sexual harassment claims against then Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore as part of the operation.
AFT didn’t prove that the allegedly stolen information was proprietary or that Jorge made unlawful recordings, Judge Linda Parker of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan said in the decision. Although the union posed the case as a trade secret dispute, Parker focused on what she said were free speech issues.
Parker denied AFT-Michigan a preliminary injunction against publication, saying that would “infringe upon” Project Veritas’ First Amendment right. But she also found that the union has a “likelihood to succeed on the merits” of a separate claim for “breach of duty of loyalty.”
Mersino called the court’s decision a victory for the First Amendment.
“One side of the aisle calls out ‘fake news,’ the other side cries ‘faux news,’ but frankly our judicial system protects all sides and that’s the beauty of our system and our country,” Mersino said.
“Here we had plaintiffs who came into court without knowing any facts that supported their case and not having the law on their side, and I think the judge had a very thoughtful opinion and issued a good order,” Mersino said.
Cousens said he “respectfully” disagrees with the First Amendment analysis. He added that he plans to continue with the lawsuit. The court said the union has a “viable claim” and “substantial probability of success” based on the breach of a duty of loyalty charge because Jorge “lied to get into the building, lied about who she was and about why she was there,” Cousens said. “The judge has not dismissed the case or any part of it, she’s only ruled on a request for injunction, and we have every intention of moving forward with the litigation.”
“We disagree that they have a likelihood of success,” Mersino said. “How that plays out, we will have to see.”
The case is AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas et al, No. 4:17-cv-13292, E.D. Mich., 10/6/2017
To contact the reporter on this story: Hassan A. Kanu in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Chris Opfer at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)