Bloomberg BNA’s Corporate Law & Accountability Report is available on the Corporate Law Resource Center. This news service keeps corporate practitioners informed of legal developments of...
By Michael Greene
March 9 — Responding to a divisive 2014 Delaware Supreme Court opinion, the Delaware State Bar's Corporation Law Council has proposed long-expected legislation to restrict the ability of corporations to adopt fee-shifting bylaws or charter provisions.
The March 6 proposed bill, which picks up from a tabled proposal during the 2014 legislative session, also endorses Delaware forum selection provisions.
If passed, the bill would invalidate fee-shifting provisions that allow stock corporations to recoup litigation expenses from unsuccessful plaintiffs.
The proposal, however, would still allow fee-shifting provision to be enforced in non-stock corporations, which is what the Delaware Supreme Court has conceptually endorsed, and would not prevent application of “losers pay” provisions included in stockholder agreements
In addition, the council also proposed amendments to Delaware General Corporation Law §262 to address concerns that Delaware's appraisal statute is being abused.
The proposed amendments to § 262 will be considered at the Delaware State Bar's Corporation Law Section meeting March 13, while the fee-shifting and forum selection proposals are expected to be considered at a section meeting to be scheduled in early April.
Responding to a certified question in May 2014, the Delaware Supreme Court in ATP Tour Inc. v. Deutscher Tennis Bund found that fee-shifting provisions in the bylaws of a Delaware non-stock corporation can be enforceable.
Since the Supreme Court's decision, fee-shifting bylaws have proven to be a lightning rod for controversy in the corporate community, with both plaintiffs' firms and academics raising concerns regarding the impact of such bylaws on stockholder actions.
A plaintiff in an ongoing Delaware Chancery Court class action lawsuit is challenging the applicability of a fee-shifting bylaw.
According to its explanation of the legislative proposal, the council believes that absent legislation, many corporations will adopt fee-shifting provisions. The council further states that widespread adoption of these types of provisions would effectively eliminate stockholder litigation that is essential to the enforcement of statutory and fiduciary obligations.
Professor Charles Elson, director of the University of Delaware's John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance, told Bloomberg BNA March 9 that he believes the proposed legislation will pass. He also stated that in most circumstances, there is a better way to prevent abusive litigation than fee-shifting provisions in bylaws and charters.
Jeff Mahoney, the Council of Institutional Investors' general counsel, in a statement e-mailed to BBNA said that limiting the scope of ATP Tour benefits long-term investors and Delaware.
“Long-term investors benefit because the accountability of Delaware stock corporations to their owners would no longer be diminished by the existence of fee shifting provisions that effectively eliminate shareowner rights,” he said. “Moreover, the State of Delaware would benefit by maintaining the State’s long-standing leadership role as the preeminent adjudicator of business dispute—a role that would be at risk if the ATP Tour decision is not remedied by the legislature.”
In December 2014, CII asked the Delaware State Bar to formulate and recommend a proposal to the Delaware General Assembly that would either overturn or narrow ATP Tour.
However, not everyone is endorsing the council's proposals. “The Delaware Bar Association’s list of recommendations is a huge win for Delaware's lawsuit business at the expense of shareholders in Delaware companies. Their proposal does precious little to solve the broadly-recognized problem of abusive mergers and acquisitions litigation, while taking away the fee-shifting approach some companies have used to combat it” said Lisa A. Rickard, president of the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, in a statement e-mailed to BBNA.
“The only guaranteed winners will be Delaware lawyers—who've effectively strengthened their grip over these M&A lawsuits—at the expense of Delaware's corporate law franchise,” she added.
Largely because of opposition from the business community, the Delaware State Senate in January 2014 tabled a bill that would have prohibited loser pays bylaws. The bill's sponsor, state Sen. Bryan Townsend (D-Newark), has not responded to requests for comment about whether he would reintroduce a similar bill this legislative session.
The council proposal also would validate exclusive forum selection provisions included in a corporation's bylaws and charter by confirming the Delaware Supreme Court's holding in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corp.
The proposal, however, would also preclude Delaware corporations from adopting such provisions if they prevent litigating claims in Delaware courts, which appears to overturn a recent chancery court ruling applying the Boilermakers decision.
In FAQs that accompanied the proposed legislation, the council states the it “believes that stockholders of Delaware corporations should not be denied access to the protections of Delaware courts.” It further states “the value of Delaware as a favored jurisdiction of incorporation is dependent on a consistent development of a balance of corporate law, and that the Delaware courts are best situated to continue to oversee that development.”
The council is also proposing two modifications to Delaware's appraisal statute.
The first would create a de minimis exception that would limit appraisal claims in public company transactions.
The second modification would provide corporations with the option of limiting the accrual of interest on appraisal awards.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Greene in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan Tuck at firstname.lastname@example.org
The fee-shifting and forum selection proposal is available at http://op.bna.com/car.nsf/r?Open=mgre-9ufsfe.
The proposed appraisal amendments are available at http://op.bna.com/car.nsf/r?Open=mgre-9ufsbs.
The council's explanation of its fee-shifting and forum selection proposal is available at http://op.bna.com/car.nsf/r?Open=mgre-9ufsdb.
A summary of the proposed appraisal amendment is available at http://op.bna.com/car.nsf/r?Open=mgre-9ufseh.
The FAQs are available at http://op.bna.com/car.nsf/r?Open=mgre-9ufs9w.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)