Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
By Sam Pearson
Chemical companies, oil refiners and other industrial sites will see a reprieve from an Obama administration regulation that would have imposed new safety requirements, the Environmental Protection Agency said.
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt signed a final rule June 12 delaying a final rule amending the risk management program regulations (RIN:2050-AG82) to Feb. 19, 2019, the agency said. The decision grants requests by industry trade organizations and companies such as Marathon Petroleum, LyondellBassell Corp., Western Refining, and Koch Industries, which met with the EPA on the issue this year.
The 20-month delay of the regulation’s effective date will allow the EPA’s new leadership to review two industry petitions for reconsideration and a third petition from 11 states and public comments, as well as to “consider other issues that may benefit from additional public input,” Pruitt said in a statement.
The rule came at the end of a multiyear Obama administration effort to close regulatory gaps at high-risk chemical facilities after a Texas fertilizer plant explosion killed 15 people in April 2013. It changes how high-risk plants must share information with nearby residents, evaluate plants after safety events, and work with local responders, among other modifications
Possible changes to the regulation could include reducing the ways in which companies must provide the public with access to information about facility operations, relaxing requirements for safety audits, and ending a mandate that high-risk plants evaluate if they can operate using safer chemical processes, among other proposals.
The decision was “disappointing but not surprising,” given Pruitt’s record on regulatory issues, Yogin Kothari, a Washington representative at the Union of Concerned Scientists, told Bloomberg BNA June 12.
Scott Jensen, a spokesman for the American Chemistry Council, said in an email to Bloomberg BNA June 12 Pruitt “has made the right and necessary decision to review the problematic changes that could undermine the safety of chemical facilities and communities across the country and threaten the continued success of the underlying program.”
The EPA received three petitions for reconsideration from two industry groups and the attorneys general of Louisiana, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Wisconsin, and West Virginia. The first was filed Feb. 28 by the RMP Coalition—an industry group comprised of the American Chemistry Council, American Forest & Paper Association, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, and the Utility Air Regulatory Group.
Another group, the Chemical Safety Advisory Group, which did not initially disclose its members, also filed a petition for reconsideration March 13. According to an EPA meeting log posted June 9, its members include Patricia McCullough, director of environmental regulatory affairs at Koch Industries; Scott Haney, corporate safety supervisor at Marathon Petroleum Corp.; Steven Cook, senior corporate counsel at LyondellBassell Industries; and Marise Textor, director of regulatory affairs at Western Refining Inc. None responded to requests for comment June 12.
The decision caps a process launched in late March, when Pruitt announced the delay would be considered. The EPA subsequently heard from industry and chemical safety groups at a public meeting April 19 and accepted written comments through May 19.
Pruitt criticized the proposed rule in 2016 as Oklahoma attorney general, writing a letter to the EPA assailing the plan as harmful to chemical plants’ security.
To contact the reporter on this story: Sam Pearson in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor on this story: Rachael Daigle at email@example.com
The EPA's final rule is available at http://src.bna.com/pLX.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)