Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
By Rachel Leven
Scott Pruitt hasn’t said the words “public health” and has rarely said the word “health” in his first month of public speeches as EPA administrator, a review by Bloomberg BNA shows.
While a free-market advocate said the rhetoric isn’t a reliable metric showing Pruitt’s commitment to public health, an Obama-era EPA communications director said significant work goes into messaging for these kinds of events and that the missing words are a fair indicator of the agency’s direction.
“Words matter,” Liz Purchia, who served as communications director under then-EPA administrator Gina McCarthy, told Bloomberg BNA. She said that his actions so far match his rhetoric and “the words that he uses signal to all Americans where he’s going to prioritize his time and the issues he wants to focus on.”
Exposure to different kinds of environmental pollution can lead to health risks from asthma to cancer. The EPA’s mission is to “protect human health and the environment,” in part to prevent those negative health impacts.
While it is early in Pruitt’s service, his focus on regulations over health is one metric that may indicate a shift in the agency’s approach.
The Environmental Protection Agency didn’t respond to multiple messages requesting comment.
Pruitt, who sued the EPA 14 times as Oklahoma attorney general, has made at least eight scheduled appearances since Feb. 17 as the agency administrator. He spoke to EPA employees, the National League of Cities Congressional City Conference, Conservative Political Action Conference, Farm Bureau Advocacy Conference, CERAWeek, National Review Institute’s Idea Summit and the U.S. Conference of Mayor’s Winter Leadership Meeting.
Bloomberg BNA analyzed seven of those speeches. He never said the words “public health” and only overtly said the word “health” three times over the course of these appearances. In contrast, McCarthy said the term “public health” at least 16 times and, separately, “health” 13 times, according to a review of seven speeches from 2016 on the EPA website.
The EPA and the National Association of Manufacturers declined to make public audio from a March appearance by Pruitt to the association’s board. The meeting was closed to the press.
The new administrator emphasized a few common themes in the speeches: We can disagree in a civil manner and still work together. We will follow the appropriate processes, including not using “sue-and-settle” consent decrees. We will provide regulatory certainty. We will be partners to states, not punishers.
“We’ve lived under this narrative for the last several years that if you’re pro-energy, you’re anti-environment, and if you’re pro-environment, you’re anti-energy. We can do better than that,” Pruitt said at the cities conference this month. “We have always been able to strike the balance between being a good steward of our natural resources, but also growing our jobs and our economy, and doing so in a responsible way.”
McCarthy’s speeches that Bloomberg BNA reviewed generally focused more on health outcomes and the impacts of environmental pollution on individuals, even as she emphasized that addressing pollution problems like climate change could be a boon for jobs and the economy.
“We all can’t wait for anything to get the work done that we need to do to keep our kids’ future secure, and to continue to make progress on public health, because after all, EPA is a public health agency,” McCarthy said in May at Vermont Law School’s commencement. “That is what we do for a living.”
Will Yeatman, senior fellow at the free-market Competitive Enterprise Institute, told Bloomberg BNA that it is somewhat disingenuous to measure Pruitt’s public efforts by searching for that term in his speeches.
Pruitt did discuss improving environmental outcomes and benefiting communities at various events. These comments show Pruitt is focusing on “public health by another name,” Yeatman said.
Yeatman said that the rhetoric in the speeches discussing a refocusing of the agency to its authority allocated by congressional is encouraging.
“I hope we get some management in place and we get that,” Yeatman said. “That would be great.”
Purchia disagreed. It would be up to the administrator, but generally there are a large number of personnel involved in writing the agency head’s speeches “to make sure there’s a coherent and unified message,” she said.
“They don’t just go out there and say whatever comes to mind,” said Purchia, who is now a partner at Riff City Strategies.
What we know of Pruitt’s speaking schedule—where he is speaking—is also telling, Purchia said. McCarthy spoke to the same stakeholders, but she also spoke to communities and nurses and environmentalists, Purchia said, adding that it isn’t clear who else Pruitt has spoken to.
Purchia and Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, said Pruitt’s actions so far have aligned with his rhetoric. Benjamin said Pruitt’s “denial of climate change” and rolling back of certain rules are actions that harm human health.
Pruitt has de-emphasized the link between climate change and carbon dioxide, despite the vast majority of science showing that human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are a primary driver of climate change.
But, Benjamin said, Pruitt is still new to the agency. He expressed hope that the administrator would recognize over time “that his most important job is to protect human health through the lens of the environment” and would listen to the agency experts on science and policy.
“He needs to follow the science and the law,” Benjamin said. “If he continues on the path of his actions so far, he is undermining his fundamental authority in the office.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Rachel Leven in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)