Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt’s deeper involvement in Superfund cleanup decisions could weaken regional office ties to sites and favor less costly cleanup, attorneys and community residents say.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s regional offices play a major role in deciding how contaminated sites should be remediated. Since Pruitt will now be involved in those decisions earlier, some say he could cut down on cleanup costs.
But, local Superfund site advocates worry they’ll lose out on funding and opportunities to weigh in.
“We’ve had a very good rapport with our region,” Jane Keon, former chair of the citizen task force for the Pine River Superfund site in Michigan, told Bloomberg BNA. “It’s been very hard to get federal money ... and our region has really bent over backwards to scrape up funds.”
Pruitt released a memo May 9 indicating that he wants to be involved in cleanup decisions earlier in the process, and formally sign-off on decisions where site cleanups are expected to cost more than $50 million. Those sites are also known as Superfund “megasites,” and often involve costly and time-consuming mining, sediment or groundwater cleanup.
The EPA told Bloomberg BNA May 11 it estimates the new policy would affect about 10 sites.
In the memo, Pruitt puts Superfund sites at the center of the agency’s mission.
Mathy Stanislaus, former assistant administrator of EPA’s Office of Land and Emergency Management, told Bloomberg BNA it’s important to consider the motivation behind those changes.
“This pulling back of authority into the administrators office: Is it substantive, or is it political?” he said.
Pruitt may take the opportunity to choose less costly remedies for Superfund sites, according to Peter deFur, president of the consulting firm Environmental Stewardship Concepts.
“My prediction would be that it will be more monitored natural attenuation ... a lot more capping of sediment sites, less pump-and-treat for groundwater sites,” he told Bloomberg BNA.
Pruitt’s involvement may also reduce the likelihood of remedies with costs exceeding $1 billion, Steve Jawetz, principal at Beveridge and Diamond, P.C. in Washington, told Bloomberg BNA.
DeFur added the administrator’s decisions will help companies specializing in certain types of environmental remediation.
“Every time you shift the effort at the national level to a less invasive [method], the dredgers are going to lose and the cappers are going to win,” he said.
The new delegation of authority could bottleneck decisions on cleanup efforts, among other effects. But it may be too early to know for sure what they are, Jawetz said.
Involving the administrator early on may create confusion for regional offices, he said, since those offices may need to decide whether to involve the administrator’s office before a proposed remedial action plan has been drafted. Given the additional review burden at the administrator’s office, Jawetz said more staff will likely be necessary.
Plus, companies that are potentially responsible for cleanup also may opt to communicate with the administrator’s office more frequently for large sites.
“Substantive involvement by the Administrator in remedies proposed throughout the country may prove to be a bottleneck, particularly at the end of the fiscal year when many remedy decisions have typically been made,” he said in an email. “We will just have to see how this new approach is implemented.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Sylvia Carignan in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Connolly at PConnolly@bna.com
The EPA memo announcing the new reviews of Superfund sites is available here: http://src.bna.com/oML
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)