Access practice tools, as well as industry leading news, customizable alerts, dockets, and primary content, including a comprehensive collection of case law, dockets, and regulations. Leverage...
By Peter Leung
Nov. 8— REG Synthetic Oils LLC will have another chance to defend some hydrocarbon-related patent claims after a federal appeals court Nov. 8 said an e-mail chain that helped show the invention was conceptualized before a piece of prior art was published was wrongly excluded in a patent validity challenge proceeding ( REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC v. Neste Oil OYJ , 2016 BL 372050, Fed. Cir., No. 2015-1773, 11/8/16 ).
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, however, affirmed the Patent Trial & Appeal Board's ruling that several other claims in U.S. Patent No. 8,231,804 are anticipated by another piece of prior art.
The case clarifies which types of evidence may be considered inadmissible hearsay in PTAB proceedings.
Neste Oil OYJ filed for inter partes review challenging the validity of a patent covering methods for making a type of hydrocarbon chain that is ideal for certain uses, such as insulation. The board found that claims 1, 3, 4 and 8 lacked novelty in light of one piece of prior art, referred to as Craig, and claims, 1-3, 5 and 8 were anticipated by another piece of prior art, referred to as Dindi.
The PTAB rejected REG's argument that the invention was conceptualized before Dindi was published. In doing so, the board excluded from evidence most parts of an e-mail chain that showed the inventor telling a business partner that he had achieved the purity level required for the invention.
The '804 patent was filed when the inventor could claim a priority date based on the invention's date and a continuing effort to reduce it to practice. The America Invents Act, which passed in 2011, changed the law so that the first inventor to file the patent application has priority.
The Federal Circuit said the PTAB incorrectly applied the hearsay rule. Although the e-mail chain is potentially hearsay, REG offered it for the non-hearsay purpose of showing that the inventor thought he'd achieved the desired purity level, the court said. Where a communication has legal significance, it is not hearsay, it said.
This e-mail communication was legally significant because it shows the inventor told a third party about the conception of his invention at a particular date, the court said. When combined with two pieces of evidence not in dispute, the e-mail chain establishes that the invention was conceived before the Dindi prior art, it said.
The court vacated the PTAB's ruling on the conception issue, remanding for further analysis and fact-finding on claims 2 and 5. It affirmed the PTAB's ruling that claims 1, 3, 4 and 8 were anticipated by the Craig prior art.
Judges Sharon Prost, Richard G. Taranto and Raymond T. Chen decided the case, with Chen writing the opinion. Foley & Lardner LLP represented REG. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP represented Neste.
To contact the reporter on this story: Peter Leung in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mike Wilczek at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text available at http://src.bna.com/jXf.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)