Access practice tools, as well as industry leading news, customizable alerts, dockets, and primary content, including a comprehensive collection of case law, dockets, and regulations. Leverage...
By Peter Leung
Jan. 26 — The Federal Circuit's finding that the Lanham Act's prohibition on registering disparaging marks is unconstitutional also dooms the ban on scandalous and immoral marks, the Patent and Trademark Office admitted on Jan. 21.
The PTO said that, though a court could well-distinguish between the ban on disparaging marks and the bar against scandalous and immoral marks, the breadth of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's en banc ruling in In re Tam essentially made it impossible to do so. (246 PTD, 12/23/15)
The PTO made this admission in a letter brief filed in another Federal Circuit case, In re Brunetti. The applicant there is appealing the rejection of his mark “fuct,” which the PTO found violated the prohibition on scandalous or immoral marks contained in Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act. The ban on disparaging marks is found in the same section, as well as other prohibitions such as on marks using certain geographical indicators.
The PTO's brief relates to one of the biggest questions following the Tam decision, which involved an Asian American band attempting to register its own name, the Slants. While the Federal Circuit said that opinion was limited to the bar against disparaging marks, some lawyers suggested that it called into question other provisions in Section 2 as well.
“What the majority seems to be saying is that, to withstand strict scrutiny, a prohibition has to be to protect investment or to prevent consumer confusion,” Professor Christine Fahey of American University told Bloomberg BNA when the Tam decision was released. “So much of Section 2 will fall victim if this is the analysis.”
In its brief, the PTO suggested that, had the Federal Circuit decided Tam on narrower grounds, the disparagement and scandalous provisions could be treated differently. For example, while the court found that the disparagement provision was viewpoint discrimination because it only blocked registrations of marks perceived by the referenced group as negative—and not those perceived as positive—this reasoning does not necessarily apply to the bar on scandalous or immoral marks.
Similarly, it suggested that the government's interest in denying the registration of sexually explicit marks is different from its interest in blocking disparaging marks, a potentially important point because the constitutionality of laws restricting free speech may turn, in part, on the government interest advanced by the restriction.
While admitting that the Federal Circuit's ruling in Tam left no grounds to differentiate the bar on scandalous and immoral marks from the struck-down prohibition on disparaging marks, the PTO noted that it reserved the right to seek Supreme Court review. In such a case, the PTO suggested that it may not only defend the constitutionality of both provisions but argue that they should be treated differently.
To contact the reporter on this story: Peter Leung in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mike Wilczek in Washington at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)