From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
Monday morning musings for workplace watchers
Life After Encino Motorcars | The Europeans Are Coming | Checking In With Doug Seaton
Ben Penn: Even without a permanent boss at the Wage and Hour Division, the agency has arguably been juggling more initiatives than any other Labor Department office. And for the greater part of the past year, these various efforts—regulatory and deregulatory moves, guidance, enforcement, and compliance assistance—have all taken place under the unassuming leadership of acting WHD Administrator Bryan Jarrett.
With the Senate in apparently no rush to confirm South Carolina employment official Cheryl Stanton to the post, it’s time to figure out who Jarrett is anyway, and what he’s been up to. That’s why I headed over to the American Payroll Association conference Friday to hear the WHD’s top official for now—a 2011 Stanford Law grad—address the crowd in some of his first public remarks in the role.
Most of the speech was designed to get the payroll professionals up to speed on ongoing WHD activity. But Jarrett, a 2011 Stanford Law grad, also offered a hint of some updated guidance in the pipeline to conform to a recent Supreme Court decision on exemptions to the Fair Labor Standards Act. The justices rejected the legal principle that such exemptions should be construed as narrowly as possible.
“As these litigation developments happen, we’re trying to…update all of our regulatory guidance materials to make them as accurate and updated as possible,” Jarrett said, immediately after he explained the April ruling in Encino Motorcars.
Businesses and management attorneys were already preparing to seize on the opportunity to declare more workers ineligible for overtime and minimum wage, as a result of the justices’ decision that car service advisers aren’t entitled to time-and-a-half pay. Jarrett’s words now suggest that employers may be getting further clarity on this matter from the federal government’s wage enforcement arm.
Jarrett’s remarks Friday struck a balance between the interests of employers and those of workers. A few ongoing priorities he talked about could have been ripped from the pages of old David Weil speeches.
For instance, the WHD is marching forward with memorandums of understanding with states to exchange information when investigating businesses. The division will also be doing targeted, data-driven investigations that don’t rely on workers to bring complaints. And it’s working to reach compliance agreements with large franchisers patterned after a deal reached with Subway in 2016 to train franchisees on FLSA compliance.
Will these remain priorities of eventual WHD chief Stanton? Time will tell. In the meantime, know that extended temporary leadership is nothing new for the division, which was run by acting administrators for the first five plus years of the Obama administration.
Chris Opfer: If you’re like me, you spent the weekend doing everything humanly possible to avoid hearing one more word about the British royal wedding. Here’s some news out of Europe that you can actually use: Enhanced data security requirements for businesses operating in the European Union go into effect on Friday.
The General Data Protection Regulation requires companies to beef up safeguards for employee, customer, and other personal information. It covers a wide range of data and applies to U.S. companies that have workers in Europe or that target EU consumers. I recently checked in with Alisa Chestler, a shareholder at Baker Donelson, about how employers are gearing up. Here are some of the high points:
I can’t tell you whether Prince Philip led the electric slide at the royal reception, but I can say that we will continue to follow the GDPR and impacts it may have for companies based on this side of the Atlantic.
BP: The House Workforce Protections Subcommittee will convene May 23 for a hearing titled, “Regulatory Reform: Unleashing Economic Opportunity for Workers and Employers.” It wouldn’t be another congressional session if we didn’t resurrect the age-old Capitol Hill debate on how to make regulations work best for the workforce.
This time around, that panel title may lend itself to discussion of anything from tip pooling data, or the merits of rolling back more occupational safety rules, to the wisdom of writing an NLRB joint employer regulation.
I’ll throw out another timely topic for the panel to consider—What happened to the DOL proposed rule to implement the president’s apprenticeship executive order? And as a followup, Is the department putting that regulation on the back burner in favor of a guidance document that could get faster results in terms of driving apprenticeship growth?
The most recent unified regulatory agenda estimates a September release for a proposed rule that establishes new guidelines for third parties to certify apprenticeship programs, an effort to boost the number of apprentices by putting industry in the driver’s seat. But the more imminent policy mechanism for scaling-up the earn-as-you-learn apprenticeship model is seen as guidance.
The Trump Labor Department will need to exert caution lest it expose itself to accusations of hypocrisy.
Republicans, including current Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, charged the Obama administration with using guidance to change the interpretation of statutes while sidestepping the regulatory process and avoiding the consideration of public input.
CO: Remember Doug Seaton? The Minnesota labor lawyer was up for an NLRB seat before the White House opted to go with Marvin Kaplan and Bill Emanuel. Seaton first made a name for himself by helping employers avoid unionization. Now he’s spending most of his time representing workers who want to decertify their unions. That includes a group of Minnesota personal care attendants who say they no longer want to be represented by a union.
Seaton recently told me he’s “impressed” with what he has seen so far from the Republican-majority NLRB General Counsel Peter Robb. “When you’re trying to turn the battleship around, it takes some activity on behalf of the leadership,” Seaton told me.
Seaton also said he’d like to see the general counsel and the five-member board take another look at Obama era decisions that make it harder for workers to drop union representation.
“Forced unionization is the kind of labor policy you would see from Mussolini, Stalin, and Hitler,” Seaton said. “The bargaining and decertification process needs to change so there really is a self-determination climate again.”
Roughly six percent of private sector workers are currently represented by unions.
The White House didn’t give Seaton an official explanation for why the Trump administration decided to go with Kaplan and Emanuel for the board spots. Seaton said Democrats are to blame for the “unprecedented” and “politically-motivated” conflicts of interest questions dogging Emanuel these days. But he also said he’s still interested in a board seat if those questions force one to open up.
“It is conceivable that someone will step down,” Seaton said. “I don’t know if they will turn to the other name that was on the list, yours truly.”
We’re punching out. Daily Labor Report subscribers can check in during the week for updates. In the meantime, feel free to reach out to us: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org or on Twitter: @ChrisOpfer and @BenjaminPenn.
See you back here next Monday.
Bloomberg Law® helps labor and employment law practitioners provide rapid, accurate, and complete advice to clients by bringing together trusted, market-leading Bloomberg BNA content like Daily Labor Report® and treatises like Covenants Not to Compete: A State-by-State Survey and The Developing Labor Law, with a fully integrated, innovative legal research platform. Click here to request a free trial.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)