Daily Report for Executives provides in-depth coverage of unfolding legislative, regulatory, and judicial news from the nation’s capital, the states, and around the world. This daily news service...
Repatriated revenue from an international tax overhaul is slated to pay for tax cuts, not infrastructure, leaving questions about how the White House will fund its infrastructure proposal, a pair of senior Republican lawmakers told Bloomberg Government.
Revenue from repatriating taxes on overseas corporate earnings was floated as a possible way to fund a $200 billion direct federal investment in infrastructure, as part of President Donald Trump’s promised $1 trillion infrastructure package.
Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), a senior member of the House Budget and Appropriations committees, had hoped income from repatriation could help pay for an infrastructure package, he told Bloomberg Government.
“We may have already lost that battle because it seems that it’s all going to tax reform,” he said.
The battle is lost, Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), a member of the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee and the fourth-ranking Republican, told Bloomberg Government.
“Repatriation is going to be an offset for tax reform,” Thune said.
Thune and Diaz-Balart both put the onus on the White House to come up with a solution to fund infrastructure.
“We need to pay for this stuff and there are other ways of doing it and I’m anxious to hear what those are,” Thune said.
Gary Cohn, President Trump’s top economic adviser, suggested during an Oct. 25 meeting with a bipartisan group of lawmakers that a gas tax increase could help fund a 2018 infrastructure plan, Bloomberg News reported. Trump previously told Bloomberg News that he would consider raising the tax, which goes to fund the federal Highway Trust Fund.
The tax is currently 18.4 cents per gallon for gasoline and 24.4 cents per gallon for diesel and has not been increased since 1993. The trust fund has required several infusions from the general fund in recent years to remain solvent.
Thune said he had been under the impression until Oct. 25 that a gas tax increase was off the table.
Whether he would support an increase “would depend entirely on the context—if we could reduce some taxes in other areas,” he said.
“I do think that we’ve got to deal with the trust fund shortage,” Thune said. “If we’re going to have a Highway Trust Fund and that’s how we’re going to fund infrastructure, we can’t continue to borrow from the general fund put it on the debt and bill to our kids. That doesn’t make sense.”
House Republicans do not expect a gas tax increase would pass that body, but several lawmakers said they were open to the idea.
“Everything is on the table, I’ve always said that. I think it would be hard to pass a gas tax over here. We’ll wait and see they come up with and what their proposal is. I haven’t talked to Cohn, yet,” Rep. Sam Graves (R-Mo.) told reporters Oct. 26.
Diaz-Balart opposes an increase in the gas tax, which he called “regressive” and not sustainable.
“I know that people have considered it to fix the hole in the DOT trust fund, but I don’t think that’s the way to do it,” he said.
With repatriation revenue promised elsewhere and a gas tax increase looking questionable, Republicans are looking to the White House for details and ideas on how to fund the president’s much-touted infrastructure proposal.
Diaz-Balart said he is “curious” to see how the administration plans to fund the yet-to-be-revealed infrastructure plan.
“I’m open to different ideas when it come to infrastructure and at this point I’m not ruling anything out,” Thune said.
The administration expects to unveil more details on its infrastructure proposal after Congress deals with the tax overhaul. The dwindling congressional calendar all but guarantees work on an infrastructure bill won’t get underway until 2018.
To contact the reporter on this story: Shaun Courtney in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Hendrie at pHendrie@bna.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)