Employee Benefits News examines legal developments that impact the employee benefits and executive compensation employers provide, including federal and state legislation, rules from federal...
T. Rowe Price Group Inc. is accused of profiting at the expense of its employees’ retirement savings by offering, almost exclusively, in-house mutual funds in the company’s $1.7 billion 401(k) plan ( Feinberg v. T. Rowe Price Group Inc. , D. Md., No. 1:17-cv-00427, complaint filed 2/14/17 ).
T. Rowe Price offered between 80 and 95 investment funds to participants each year—all in-house funds, according to a lawsuit filed Feb. 14 in federal court in Maryland. These funds were expensive compared not only to funds offered by other investment companies, including Vanguard Investments, but also compared to other funds offered by T. Rowe Price to its commercial customers, the lawsuit said.
“We believe the suit is without merit and intend to defend vigorously,” a T. Rowe Price spokesman told Bloomberg BNA Feb. 15 via e-mail.
With the lawsuit, which seeks class treatment for 8,200 participants, T. Rowe Price joins a growing list of financial companies that face accusations of causing millions of dollars in losses to their workers, in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, by filling their retirement plans with in-house mutual funds.
Lawsuits are pending against more than a dozen financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, BB&T Corp., Allianz Asset Management of America, Putnam Investments LLC, Deutsche Bank, Franklin Templeton, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo & Co., Edward D. Jones & Co., American Century Services LLC, New York Life Insurance Co., Neuberger Berman Group LLC and Charles Schwab Corp.
At issue in the latest lawsuit is the alleged millions of dollars in fees for investment advice participants paid to T. Rowe Price affiliates. Investment advice services and the fees generated by them “are the company’s cash cow, accounting for more than 85 percent of its annual revenue during 2015,” according to information about the company on the Bloomberg Terminal.
Participants allegedly paid T. Rowe Price affiliates in excess of $50 million in fees for investment advice.
Prior to 2012, the funds offered through the company’s 401(k) plan were almost all retail-class shares of mutual funds, which are the most expensive type of investment funds offered in retirement plans, the lawsuit alleged. In 2012 and 2014, T. Rowe Price started offering less costly funds, including collective investment trusts and institutional-class shares of mutual funds, the complaint said.
However, there were comparable lower-cost alternatives for all the funds offered through the plan, the lawsuit said. A table included in the lawsuit shows that some T. Rowe Price funds had very expensive ratios compared to those offered by Vanguard.
If alternative comparable funds had been used in the plan, rather than in-house funds, participants would have paid over $27 million less in fees, the complaint said. And, if such less expensive funds had been used to replace the T. Rowe Price funds in areas where the company was weak, participants would have earned at least $123 million more for their retirement, the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit also named as defendants a number of T. Rowe Price affiliates and executives, including its chairman Brian C. Rogers, who this week joined the Harvard University endowment board to oversee the university’s $35.7 billion fund.
McTigue Law LLP and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC represent the participants.
To contact the reporter on this story: Carmen Castro-Pagan in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jo-el J. Meyer at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the complaint is at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Feinberg_v_T_Rowe_Price_Group_Inc_et_al_Docket_No_117cv00427_D_Md.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)