The Product Safety & Liability Reporter™ provides updates on significant developments and issues in product safety and liability litigation and regulation, plus analysis from top litigators. Get...
Sept. 16 — Public attention is focused on overheating and fires in Samsung Electronics Co.'s newest phone, the Galaxy Note 7. But fire hazards also plague the company’s Galaxy S7 Edge smartphone, a recently filed suit asserts.
And a class complaint covering both models may be in the works.
Daniel Ramirez’s Sept. 8 complaint alleges an S7 Edge exploded in his pocket, causing serious burns ( Ramirez v. Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc. , N.J. Super. Ct., No. not available, complaint filed 9/8/16 ).
As with the Note 7, the phone’s lithium ion battery is identified as the source of the problem.
A lawyer for Ramirez, T. Michael Morgan, told Bloomberg BNA Sept. 15 he’s also working on a proposed class action related to the overheating issue in both product lines.
“Our investigation is going further than just a specific model of the Samsung phones and really looking into the totality of their battery manufacturing, sourcing and producing,” said Morgan, who’s with Morgan & Morgan P.A. in Orlando, Fla.
Samsung didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Morgan said he doesn’t know of any other suits that have been filed yet about overheating smartphones, either personal-injury suits or class actions. A Bloomberg BNA review Sept. 19 of complaints filed against Samsung didn’t reveal additional overheating suits.
If Morgan’s firm files a class complaint, it could encompass both the Note 7 and the S7, he said.
The Note 7 was the subject of a unilateral company recall Sept. 2 and a Consumer Product Safety Commission-coordinated recall Sept. 15 (44 PSLR 990, 9/19/16).
The CPSC said in announcing the recall that about 1 million Note 7 phones were sold in the U.S. and 92 incidents were reported, “including 26 reports of burns and 55 reports of property damage, including fires in cars and a garage.”
Samsung concluded from preliminary testing that a manufacturing error put pressure on plates within battery cells, resulting in contact between positive and negative poles, the company told a Korean standards agency (44 PSLR 991, 9/19/16).
“What we think we’re going to find out from discovery is that the race to have the most battery capacity and the fastest-charging battery is what’s leading to these incidents,” Morgan said.
A class action-oriented website maintained by Morgan’s firm featured a post Sept. 14 saying the company offered S7 units as one replacement option for recalled Note 7 phones. Thus, owners could “swap one exploding phone for another,” the firm said.
Another class-action complaint takes aim at another alleged shortcoming of the S7: its water resistance Velasquez-Reyes v. Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc. , C.D. Cal., No. 5-16-cv-01953, complaint filed 9/12/16 ).
The complaint alleges that Samsung widely advertised some of its Galaxy S7 phones as submersible and capable of being sprayed or doused with liquids.
Yet plaintiff Dulce Alondra Velasquez-Reyes’s S7 phone stopped working after she inadvertently dropped it in a toilet, she alleges on behalf of a would-be nationwide class and California subclass.
Velasquez-Reyes says Samsung wouldn’t repair or replace her phone.
An attorney for Velasquez-Reyes couldn’t be reached for comment.
Samsung, which makes a variety of consumer products, also faces proposed class actions filed in recent months over some of its other products. The complaints include allegations of explosion-prone washing machines and television wall mounts that allegedly fail.
Simon & Simon P.C., along with Morgan & Morgan, represented Ramirez.
Girard Gibbs LLP represented Velasquez-Reyes.
Attorney information for Samsung isn’t publicly available yet.
To contact the reporter on this story: Martina Barash at MBarash@bna.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Patrick at firstname.lastname@example.org
The Ramirez complaint is available at http://src.bna.com/iHC.The Velasquez-Reyes complaint is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/VelasquezReyes_v_Samsung_Electronics_America_Inc_Docket_No_516cv0.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)