Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
Scientists who have received EPA grants to the “tune of literally tens of millions of dollars” won’t be allowed to serve on the agency’s advisory boards, Administrator Scott Pruitt announced Oct. 17.
The goal of this directive, which Pruitt will issue next week, is to ensure that the scientific advice the Environmental Protection Agency receives is independent, transparent, and objective, Pruitt said at an event hosted by the Heritage Foundation in Washington.
Pruitt questioned the independence, truthfulness, and transparency of recommendations that the agency received from individuals on various advisory boards that have been receiving substantial funding from the EPA, “sometimes going back years and years.”
The upcoming directive would be in line with Pruitt’s desire to alter the makeup of the EPA’s independent science panels to avoid what he termed conflict of interests. At his Jan. 18 confirmation hearing, Pruitt singled out the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, which has pressed the agency to tighten air quality standards.
Most of the EPA’s grants come out of the Office of Research and Development’s National Center for Environmental Research. The grant applications are externally reviewed and ranked before the EPA conducts a “relevancy” review to ensure that grants are given only to those scientists whose work has been rated as “very good” or “excellent” at supporting agency decisions and are deemed relevant to environmental problems.
The EPA has about 23 advisory committees that advise it on a range of environmental issues including ozone standards, pesticide use, and human health studies, according to a government database.
The advisory panels that would be most affected by Pruitt’s directive are the ones that most influence the EPA’s regulatory agenda, such as the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, Science Advisory Board, and Board of Scientific Counselors, according to Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science & Democracy for the nonprofit Union of Concerned Scientists.
For example, six of the seven members of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee have received grants from the EPA, based on a Bloomberg Environment review of an agency database.
EPA records show that the following members received agency grants:
Steve Milloy, senior fellow at E&E Legal Inc., said Pruitt’s announcement is “huge” because it will allow the agency to get a more diverse group of people to serve on the clean air committee. Right now, he said most of the members are EPA grantees who dominate the panel’s proceedings and are “all bought and paid” to do the agency’s bidding.
Milloy is part of the E&E Legal team that sued the EPA for allegedly forming the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee Particulate Matter Review Panel, a challenge that was later voluntarily dropped.
Republicans in the House and Congress have been pushing for legislation to limit the participation of scientists in clean air committees who lawmakers said were biased toward EPA policies, particularly during the Obama administration.
House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) praised Pruitt’s announcement, chiding the Obama administration for a “lack of transparency.”
“Utter nonsense” is how Rosenberg described Pruitt’s directive. He said Pruitt is turning conflict of interest on its head by comparing EPA grantees to those scientists whose research is backed by a for-profit industry. Scientists who served for no pay on these panels will have no incentive left to advise on critical public policy issues, he said.
According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, Pruitt’s directive is based on the Science Advisory Board Reform Act (H.R. 1431), which the House passed mostly along party lines toward the end of March.
To contact the reporter on this story: Amena H. Saiyid in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Rachael Daigle at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)