For the professional edge in your day-to-day practice, rely on the most timely, objective reporting on significant developments, trends, and emerging patterns in criminal law today—Criminal Law...
Few questions came up at the U.S. Supreme Court during oral argument over an infamous Washington-area murder case ( Turner v. United States, U.S., No. 15-1503 , argued 3/29/17 and Overton v. United States, U.S., No. 15-1504 , argued 3/29/17 ).
That likely means the court won’t grant relief, a law professor told Bloomberg BNA March 29.
Defendants claim prosecutors withheld evidence favorable to the defendants, and as a result their convictions should be set aside under Brady v. Maryland.
A witness at the crime scene identified a man with a violent criminal record who was convicted in 1992 for a similar murder of another middle-aged woman.
Charles S. Turner and Russell L. Overton argued that evidence would have allowed them to undermine the government’s case against them. Its theory that a large gang, rather than a small group, killed and sodomized Catherin Fuller, a middle-aged mother of eight.
Arguments took on an unusually fact-intensive focus in a court where justices typically engage in broader legal analysis.
That’s because the case is complex, involving a huge record covering a six-week trial for ten defendants, said Bennett Gershman, a law professor at The Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, New York, who focuses on prosecutorial and judicial ethics.
“It’s going to require the court to go through an intricate, complicated factual record to even be able to meaningfully weigh the issues under Brady,” Gershman said.
Attorneys for both sides presented their arguments with little interruption from the justices.
Those questions that were asked reviewed different aspects of the evidence submitted at the original trial—such as asking which witnesses contradicted each other or what errors had the lower court made in reviewing the evidence.
Gershman said the line of questioning was understandable and seemed directed toward establishing whether the allegedly withheld evidence reasonably could have changed the outcome of the trial—the standard for Turner and Overton to succeed on their claims.
Because the government’s theory of the case was based on a gang murder, testimony that it was committed by one or two people probably wouldn’t have helped, he said.
It would have acted more like impeachment evidence that undermines credibility, just like other evidence used by the other defense attorneys did, Gershman said. That minimizes the cumulative effect if the jury didn’t buy the other impeachment evidence, he said.
“Given what everyone said about a gang attack, the court is asking, ‘How could evidence of an alternative perpetrator be even credible?’” he said. “That flies in the face of all the evidence in the case.”
To contact the reporter on this story: C. Reilly Larson in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: C. Reilly Larson at firstname.lastname@example.org
Full transcropt at http://src.bna.com/ntF.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)