Daily Tax Report: State provides authoritative coverage of state and local tax developments across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, tracking legislative and regulatory updates,...
A proposed Seattle ordinance dubbed by some as a “tax Amazon” bill is being teed up for likely passage.
The measure would impose an employee head tax on businesses in the city with annual income exceeding $20 million—levying a tax of 26 cents per hour for each employee on the payroll minus vacation and sick time. The tax targets the top 3 percent of companies, about 500 entities with taxable gross income of more than $20 million. It was scheduled for introduction at the Seattle City Council’s April 23 meeting.
Amazon.com Inc. is the elephant in the room—it would pay about $20 million per year, some 27 percent of the estimated $75 million in annual revenue earmarked for low-income housing and homeless services, according to Councilmember Mike O’Brien, one of the measure’s sponsors.
Seattle’s vibrant economy has been supercharged by Amazon, adding impetus to some of the steepest housing price increases in the nation.
“It is the explosion of growth that is bringing a lot of high-income earners to our city,” Councilmember Lisa Herbold told Bloomberg Tax April 23. “It’s creating a hot housing market where those high-income earners are competing with lower-income people for housing units. That is precisely what is creating this increase in homelessness, this explosion of economic development. It is precisely that development which is creating the need for low-income housing.”
Seattle’s experience with the fallout of such rapid growth is a lesson for cities around the country vying to be the home of Amazon’s second, co-equal headquarters, often called HQ2, Councilmember Kshama Sawant told Blooomberg Tax April 23.
“Amazon pays nothing close to its fair share,” said Sawant, a socialist economist. “We are starved of revenues to fund social services and affordable housing. But we are not just talking about the soul of the city of Seattle—this is a question facing every city. Did we do something wrong by fighting for progressive change and that is why Amazon is now looking for another HQ2 city? The working people in the cities that have been shortlisted for HQ2 are now looking to our Tax Amazon movement because they recognize they are going to face the same issues.”
Five members of the nine-member, politically progressive council have said they will vote for the measure, leaving a possible veto as the last hope for those opposed. But the mayor indicated in a recent letter that she will likely live with the council’s decision, O’Brien told Bloomberg Tax.
The measure has no shortage of opponents. The Seattle Times editorialized against the measure in its April 22 edition, calling it “the latest effort by Seattle politicians to make a symbolic ‘eat the rich’ gesture” that the newspaper asserts will “reduce jobs, opportunity and Seattle’s ability to attract new employers.” It’s a view shared by the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, whose President and CEO Marilyn Strickland joined more than 180 local business leaders in signing a March 27 l etter to the council calling it a “false narrative” that business is paying less than its fair share.
Conspicuously absent from the letter were signatories who identified themselves as being from the Boeing Co., Starbucks Corp., and Nordstrom Inc.—iconic local companies.
Strickland penned an op-ed with two other authors that said: “The heated rhetoric at council meetings in support of a jobs tax has been intentionally misleading.” The assertion that “business needs to pay their fair share” ignores the fact that “almost 60 percent of Seattle’s general fund revenue comes from taxes paid by employers. That’s nearly $700 million a year. The business community also has supported city levies that raised our own taxes to support parks, transportation, housing, and the families and education levy.”
Amazon Vice President for Public Policy Brian Huseman, a former chief of staff at the Federal Trade Commission, signed the opposition letter.
Copyright © 2018 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)