SEC Loses Latest Insider Trading Trial

Stay current on changes and developments in corporate law with a wide variety of resources and tools.

By Edvard Petterssonand Maurice Possley  

June 7 — The Securities and Exchange Commission, in a third insider trading trial defeat in the past year, lost its lawsuit claiming STEC Inc.'s former chief executive officer made $134 million by selling stock before divulging a sales setback to investors.

Jurors in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California returned their verdict June 6 on the first day of deliberations.

The SEC claimed that Manouchehr Moshayedi, who co-founded the maker of computer-storage cards with his two brothers in 1990, sold 4.5 million STEC shares in an August 2009 secondary offering after learning that a major customer, EMC Corp., would scale back purchases of the ZeusIOPS flash memory product.

Three of Four

The verdict was the SEC's third loss since October 2013 out of four such cases to go to trial. Wynnefield Capital Inc.'s Nelson Obus defeated the agency last month in a Manhattan court in a suit claiming he relied on an illegal merger tip to make $1.3 million in 2001.

In October 2013, a jury in Dallas decided that Mark Cuban, the billionaire owner of pro basketball's Dallas Mavericks, didn't engage in insider trading in 2004.

The agency last month won a case in Manhattan against Michaels Stores Inc. founders Samuel and Charles Wyly, who were accused of illegally hiding their stock holdings and evading trading limits. The verdict leaves Samuel Wyly and his late brother's estate potentially liable for as much as $550 million. That case took the regulator more than a decade to bring to trial.

“We respect the jury's verdict but will continue to aggressively enforce the law when we believe the evidence supports the allegations,” John Nester, an SEC spokesman, said June 6 in an e-mailed statement.

Uniformity Intended

Moshayedi's lawyer, Patrick Gibbs, told the jury in his closing statement that a $55 million side deal with EMC, which the SEC alleged was used to hide a revenue shortfall, was meant to bring uniformity to the operations process because EMC was prone to waiting to the end of quarters, making it difficult for STEC to make accurate forecasts for analysts.

The deal wasn't meant to ensure the success of the secondary offering in which Moshayedi sold shares, according to Gibbs, but to “avoid the chaos of EMC ordering late in the quarter.”

STEC, based in Santa Ana, Calif., was acquired by Western Digital Corp. in 2013.

To contact the reporters on this story: Edvard Pettersson in Los Angeles at; Maurice Possley in Los Angeles at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

 ©2014 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.

Request Corporate on Bloomberg Law