Energy and Climate Report provides current, thorough coverage of clean energy, efficiency, and climate change legislation, regulation, policy, legal developments, and trends in the U.S. and...
Aug. 10 — Two senior members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee continued to spar with Thomas Burke, nominee for the Environmental Protection Agency's top scientific role, almost a year after his nomination hearing, documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act show.
Republican Sens. James Inhofe (Okla.), the panel's chairman, and Sen. Jeff Sessions (Ala.) asked Burke in a March 2016 letter to clarify answers on climate change modelling and the public availability of data underpinning regulatory actions from his June 11, 2015, nomination hearing.
“It is important for us to understand your position on the relevance of future projected climate impacts in assessing the accuracy of climate impacts that were previously projected and expected to occur in the past,” they wrote. “Please comment on the need for EPA to make publicly available all information and data underlying and supporting the agency's science-based findings.”
Burke, first nominated by President Barack Obama to be assistant administrator for research and development in November 2013, responded on April 12, but the committee hasn't yet voted on his nomination after cancelling a scheduled May vote.
“The committee became aware of concerns about Mr. Burke’s involvement in pesticide risk assessments and have sent additional [questions for the record] to try to clear up those concerns,” Donelle Harder, a committee spokeswoman, told Bloomberg BNA Aug. 10.
Eight of the 14 positions at the EPA requiring confirmation are vacant or staffed by acting officials. No nomination has formally cleared the Senate since August 2013.
The Republicans asked Burke to comment on whether past predictions about the costs of climate change were accurate.
“[Climate] projections include a level of confidence associated with them to account for the inherent uncertainties in climate impact models, projections and analyses,” Burke wrote in response. “I believe it is important that as new data becomes available regarding impacts and accuracy of projections, we continue to refine our future projections of climate impacts.”
The senators also asked whether the EPA should be required to post all data used in regulatory actions so “that a broad cross-section of credentialed peer reviewers and other capable investigators can independently verify the agency's scientific integrity.” Legislation requiring such an approach—the two-page Secret Science Reform Act (H.R. 1030)—passed the House in March 2015.
Burke replied that the EPA remained committed to increasing transparency in federal scientific research but said releasing all data used in rulemakings posed “tremendous challenges.”
“Making all raw data publicly available presents tremendous challenges, including the important requirements to protect human subjects and confidential business information,” he wrote. “I remain committed to pushing forward with ever increasing transparency, data accessibility and peer review to strengthen the scientific basis for our public health and policy decisions.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Anthony Adragna in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)