Bloomberg BNA’s Corporate Law & Accountability Report is available on the Corporate Law Resource Center. This news service keeps corporate practitioners informed of legal developments of...
A shareholder tool used to advocate for changes in corporate behavior would be effectively shut down under the latest Republican plan to roll back the Dodd-Frank Act.
House Financial Services Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) wants to require anyone seeking to put a proposal on the corporate ballot to hold a minimum of 1 percent of a company’s outstanding stock for three years. Currently, shareholders with as little as $2,000 in shares for a year or more can do so.
The higher threshold would block “corporate gadflies,” faith- and values-based investors and even the nation’s biggest public pension funds from trying to put an idea up for a vote of their peers at a company like Exxon Mobil Corp., where 1 percent of stock would be billions of dollars.
Only the likes of Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street would be able to propose ideas for a shareholder vote at the largest companies. Asset managers have shown little interest in wielding their voting power on proposals, much less submitting their own.
“It would shut down the shareholder proposal process completely,” said Anne Sheehan, director of corporate governance at the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS), the second largest U.S. public pension fund.
Hensarling’s provision, outlined in an April 11 committee memo, wasn’t included in the version of the Financial Choice Act that stalled after being approved by the House Financial Services Committee last year. He plans to unveil a new version this month, but it is likely to face long odds of getting enacted as introduced.
New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli, who manages the state’s retirement fund, said the legislative proposal would “diminish corporate accountability” and “put investors and corporations at risk.”
Shareholder proposals have been used to push for practices, such as electing directors by majority vote, that have become standard elements of corporate governance. Investors have also used proposals to advocate on issues such as diversity and climate change.
Business leaders, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. chief executive Jamie Dimon, complain the process has been taken over by a handful of investors who own small stakes and are pursuing “special interests” that don’t relate to shareholder value.
“It would turn into the billion dollar club,” Anne Simpson, investment director of sustainability at the more than $300 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), told Bloomberg BNA.
The Business Roundtable, a Washington-based lobbying group for chief executive officers, raised the idea of reworking the shareholder proposal process in October. What the roundtable suggested wouldn’t limit proposals as drastically as what Hensarling is considering.
Dimon, who took over in January as chairman of the roundtable, has cited “self-serving shareholder activity and proposals not intended to benefit the company” as one of the reasons for the drop in the number of public companies in the U.S. In his annual letter to JPMorgan Chase shareholders, he also blamed “shareholder meetings that are hijacked by special interest groups and become a complete farce,” among other things.
Curtailing shareholder proposals could have unintended consequences for companies.
“I think it could backfire,” said David Webber, a professor at the Boston University School of Law who researches shareholder activism and corporate governance. If the reform effort succeeds, he said many shareholders who might otherwise have filed proposals “will find other ways to confront management,” by voting against directors, for example.
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrea Vittorio in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Yin Wilczek at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)