Bloomberg BNA’s Corporate Law & Accountability Report is available on the Corporate Law Resource Center. This news service keeps corporate practitioners informed of legal developments of...
By Michael Greene
Oct. 21 — Stockholders who file an appraisal demand in relation to a merger are still entitled to the merger consideration from the surviving corporation when they don't file a formal appraisal petition within 120 days of the merger, the Delaware Chancery Court ruled Oct. 20.
Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster opined that once the appraisal petition deadline passed, “the right to appraisal lapsed for all stockholders who had demanded appraisal, triggering an obligation on the part of the surviving corporation to pay them the merger consideration.”
Defendant Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. filed for bankruptcy in 2009. Two years later the company entered into a merger agreement with a subsidiary of Rock-Tenn Co.
The pro se plaintiff stockholders made a timely demand for appraisal through their broker. However, they never filed a petition for an appraisal and eventually withdrew their demand in writing.
Even though no Smurfit-Stone stockholders ever filed an appraisal petition, Rock-Tenn took the position that the plaintiffs could only receive their merger consideration if they agreed to the companies' settlement proposals. The plaintiffs never agreed and thus were never provided with the merger consideration.
Subsequently, the plaintiffs filed an action in the chancery court alleging breaches of fiduciary duty by directors of both companies related to decisions leading up the bankruptcy, the merger agreement and the failure to provide them with merger consideration.
The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.
After dismissing all claims related to events leading up to the bankruptcy and the merger, Vice Chancellor Laster found that the “operative event” giving rise to Rock-Tenn's obligation to provide plaintiffs with the merger consideration was not plaintiffs' attempted withdrawal of its appraisal demand, but “the failure of any stockholder to file a petition for appraisal within 120 days after the effective time of the merger.”
Under § 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, stockholders must file an appraisal petition within 120 days of the merger to keep their appraisal rights from lapsing. If they fail to do so, a company may pay out the merger consideration to dissenting stockholders.
Because the 120-day deadline passed without any stockholders filing a petition, the court concluded that the plaintiffs became entitled to merger consideration and Rock-Tenn could pay this consideration “without fear that an appraisal petition might be filed later.”
The court also noted that it used a “less stringent standard” when considering the underlying substance of the plaintiffs' complaint because of their pro se status.
Vice Chancellor Laster wrote that even though the plaintiffs “had not framed a theory using recognizable legal concepts,” their claim against Rock-Tenn for failure to provide them merger consideration could be “conceptualized” under a theory of breach of contract or unjust enrichment.
In addressing the scope of damages under either of these theories, the court found that the plaintiffs were not entitled to certain consequential damages because they were not foreseeable. The court found, however, that the plaintiffs were entitled to the merger consideration of cash and stock.
Nonetheless, Vice Chancellor Laster noted that during the remedial stages of this case, the stock portion may be difficult to calculate.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Greene in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan Tuck at email@example.com
The opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Mehta_Ram_et_al_vs_SmurfitStone_Container_Corp_et_al_Docket_No_68.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)