The Accounting Policy & Practice Report ® provides financial accounting policy makers, advisors, and practitioners with the latest news, expert insights, and guidance on emerging, evolving,...
By Denise Lugo
Software companies are pushing back against a proposed change by accounting regulators for how they are required to attribute costs associated with moving data to the cloud.
A pending disclosure rule that would require companies to reveal their full costs of moving to cloud platforms would be difficult to apply, and would offer little benefit to investors, some of the biggest global software companies told the Financial Accounting Standards Board in May.
Cisco Systems Inc., Apple Inc., Google’s parent Alphabet Inc., Salesforce.com Inc., and other companies said the disclosure rule requires accountants to capture data that doesn’t yet exist.
FASB proposed the rules earlier this year, along with accounting guidance to clarify how companies should account for upfront costs they incur to migrate to the cloud. Those costs can reach up to $10 million, but companies account for them differently.
The rules would require companies to capitalize the costs—to record an asset and then subsequently recognize the amount over the term of the cloud service arrangement. The accompanying disclosures would give investors a fuller picture of what those costs are in any given quarter.
In letters to FASB, software companies argue that the “quantitative disclosure"—a requirement to provide full costs in each quarter—would prove costly, time consuming, and difficult.
Workers’ hours, for example, aren’t tracked until the application and development stage of the migration process, Salesforce said in a May 2 letter to FASB. Determining the full cost incurred would therefore mean creating a new time-tracking method for hundreds of individuals, the company said.
Accountants told Bloomberg Tax May 23 that they struggle to understand why companies would find the disclosures too difficult to provide.
“The FASB’s proposed disclosure simply asks companies to accumulate all of the costs that were capitalized and those that were expensed during a reporting period,” Scott Ehrlich, president of Mind the GAAP LLC, in West Chester, Pa., told Bloomberg Tax.
“It doesn’t seem all that burdensome to capture the data necessary to make these disclosures,” he said.
Salesforce didn’t immediately return a request for comment.
Upfront costs that companies can incur include hiring consultants, training staff, and following the necessary steps and processes to ensure their systems can interact with a cloud arrangement. Those costs are separate and substantially higher than the monthly hosting fee paid to a cloud company.
FASB proposed the rules in March to remove confusion about how to report those costs, which opened them for public comment. Some accountants have said the costs should be immediately expensed, while others seek to capitalize them.
Fifty-three companies wrote to FASB, most in favor of the accounting rules but not the full disclosure package. International Business Machines Corp., HP Inc., and Facebook Inc., for example, said providing a “qualitative disclosure” with the rules would be too extensive.
“We believe there is limited benefit a financial statement user would gain by the disclosure of costs relating to the implementation of new features, enhancements or updates to existing features,” Facebook said in an April 30 letter.
Facebook said its systems don’t specifically track these types of implementation activities because there wasn’t a requirement to do so. “As such, we would need to build tracking mechanisms within our financial reporting system to provide a report of such activities,” it said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Denise Lugo in New York at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: S. Ali Sartipzadeh at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2018 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)