Stay current on the latest developments from agencies including the CFPB, Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC to advise clients on real-life regulatory situations.
Sprint Corp. and T-Mobile Inc.'s $26 billion merger will face tough regulatory review even in the wake of the Justice Department’s loss in its suit to block AT&T Inc.'s purchase of Time Warner Inc., antitrust attorneys said.
It’s a fairly simple “horizontal” deal, combining the third-largest wireless carrier, T-Mobile, with the fourth, Sprint. That reduction in market players violates a key economic principle — four is better than three — that has been deployed in telecom antitrust reviews in the past.
“There is already a lot of thinking and scrutiny of this type of market,” Public Knowledge President Gene Kimmelman told Bloomberg Law. Sprint called off plans to merge with T-Mobile less than a year ago, saying the two could not reach favorable terms.
The revised merger now will face reviews by both the Federal Communications Commission and either the DOJ or the Federal Trade Commission. The DOJ is the likely choice for the antitrust review because it has past experience looking at deals in the industry. The FCC will review the deal to see whether it’s in the public interest.
Coming on the heels of the high-profile AT&T-Time Warner case, the government’s review of Sprint-T-Mobile’s pending transaction will be notably less complicated, Christopher Sagers, an antitrust law professor at Cleveland State University, told Bloomberg Law.
The antitrust regulators can review the Sprint-T-Mobile transaction squarely within the telecommunications market, an easy analysis, rather than look for overlapping markets in separate sectors, as they were forced to do in AT&T-Time Warner.
“The only consequence that AT&T could have, it seems to me, is that after the government’s stinging loss in AT&T, they may be feeling a little apprehensive about taking on any big, further, litigated challenges for the time being,” Sagers said.
“I don’t think the recent events change the antitrust analytics,” Kimmelman said.
Sprint CEO Marcelo Claure and T-Mobile CEO John Legere defended their merger June 27 before a Senate Judiciary Committee subcommittee that oversees antitrust issues. Claure said the planned merger will “allow us to challenge dominant cable companies,” citing Comcast Corp. and Charter Communications Inc.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), ranking member of the subcommittee, penned a letter May 7 with other Democrats urging both the FCC and DOJ to carefully review Sprint and T-Mobile’s merger and focus “on the benefits that can only be achieved as a direct result of the merger.”
They expressed concern that both companies would curb near-term investments and innovation to focus on the merger review process instead. At the hearing, Klobuchar asked whether customers would “actually see the promised lower prices or improved quality.”
Legere said T-Mobile’s “uncarrier strategy,” which offers customers no contracts and commitments for service is “possibly the most valuable thing T-Mobile has.” Moving away from it, a harm to customers, risks “annihilation,” he said.
Since announcing the deal in April, Sprint and T-Mobile said their merger is necessary to bring about 5G, the next generation of wireless technology. Combining the two companies will give the merged entity the network and spectrum capacity necessary to bring America front and center in the race to 5G, they said.
In light of the AT&T-Time Warner decision, Sprint and T-Mobile may feel they have a better argument for why they need to combine and create a bigger telecom network, said Kimmelman, who is testifying at the hearing. “It might change the environmental favor around the transactions as parties might argue that since AT&T could get bigger, Sprint and T-Mobile should be able to, as well,” he said.
But the 5G pitch alone won’t solve all the antitrust concerns with the deal, he told Bloomberg Law. “The big question is if it is truly necessary to combine the third and fourth carriers in order to continue to get meaningful network investment to improve quality, speed, and competition.”
The combination of Sprint and T-Mobile would reduce the wireless carrier market from four providers to three. Such a consolidation goes against an Obama-era DOJ principle that at least four wireless carriers are needed in the U.S. market to ensure competitiveness.
Makan Delrahim, antitrust chief at Justice Department, wouldn’t explicitly endorse that view this month, stating, “I’m not smart enough to figure out any magical number.” Delrahim added that he doesn’t prejudge a transaction solely on how it affects the number of marketplace competitors.
But consolidating the wireless marketplace to only three key players is a key antitrust concept that may dominate the subcommittee’s hearing and the regulators’ review, Kimmelman said.
“It will be hard to overcome that logical assessment that is baked into the existing antitrust precedent,” he said. “It’s a huge uphill battle here to overcome, even with the rosy picture of 5G.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Victoria Graham in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Fawn Johnson at email@example.com
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)