Standards Undergo PCAOB Cost-Benefit Analysis

The Accounting Policy & Practice Report ® provides financial accounting policy makers, advisors, and practitioners with the latest news, expert insights, and guidance on emerging, evolving,...

By Laura Tieger Salisbury

Dec. 9 — No new standard is moved from the research agenda to the standard- setting agenda unless is has passed a rigorous cost-benefit analysis by the PCAOB’s Center for Economic Analysis.

The research agenda, Martin Baumann, PCAOB’s chief auditor and standard-setting director, said is a “disciplined” way for the board to consider the best, most cost-efficient way to solve problems of audit integrity.

The first choice is to assess whether a less costly alternative to rulemaking, like a Staff Practice Alert or other guidance, would be the best way to proceed. Only after that is rejected, then the audit problem will advance to the standard-setting agenda.

Baumann made his comments Dec. 7 at the American Institute of CPAs’ session on Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards.

Topics Being Monitored

Baumann said the board was monitoring companies use of non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) financial performance measures and how auditors treat them.

Currently firms are required to read and consider “other information” under the AU 550 standard. There is no obligation to evaluate “other information” by means of audit procedures used for non-GAAP measures.

Read and Consider

The existing standard—AU 550—requires auditors only to “read and consider” other information, while the reworked proposed model standard expands the auditor’s responsibilities and accountability by:

  • requiring the auditor to evaluate the other information for a material misstatement of fact as well as for a material inconsistency with amounts or information, or the manner of their presentation, in the audited financial statements; and
  • requiring communication in the auditor’s report regarding the auditor’s responsibilities for, and the results of, the auditor’s evaluation of the other information.
Other research topics being monitored include:
  •  the need for firms to improve their quality control—such as firm governance, leadership, documenting supervisory responsibilities;
  •  research on changes in data and technology— to ensure standards can co-exist with new data tools;
  •  firms response to cybersecurity risks and attacks;
  •  audit quality indicators; and
  •  the new revenue recognition standards—he cautioned auditors to be careful to maintain their independence from management.

To contact the reporter on this story: Laura Tieger Salisbury in Washington at LSalisbury@bna.com

To contact the editor responsible for this story: S. Ali Sartipzadeh at asartipzadeh@bna.com

Copyright © 2016 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Try Accounting Policy Practice Report